Talk:58 (number)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

  • http://www.ngcic.org/
    • In IC 1337 on 2011-04-23 17:08:25, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In IC 1337 on 2011-04-24 04:34:10, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 10 (number) on 2011-05-23 02:06:58, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 10 (number) on 2011-05-31 22:27:07, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 11 (number) on 2011-06-01 02:53:15, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 138 (number) on 2011-06-01 14:55:19, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 48 (number) on 2011-06-19 14:01:14, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 52 (number) on 2011-06-19 20:05:38, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:18, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:19, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 3[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:19, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

58 is sum of first seven primes[edit]

No it isn't. The first 7 primes are

2 + 3 + 5 + 11 + 13 + 17 + 19 = 70

If you counted 1 as prime, the answer is 52

Can someone fix, I don't know how to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.155.193.120 (talk) 09:52, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing to fix:
2 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 11 + 13 + 17 =58
Dhrm77 (talk) 18:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 58 (number). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:48, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bingo names -[edit]

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers#List of British bingo nicknames for a centralized discusion as to whether Bingo names should be included in thiese articles. Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:34, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Municipal Okrugs of Saint Petersburg[edit]

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers#Municipal Okrugs of Saint Petersburg for a centralized discusion as to whether Municipal Okrugs of Saint Petersburg should be included in these pages. Certes (talk) 11:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Unreferenced" template message missing[edit]

Hello, everyone.

I've never interacted personally Wikipedia before, but I've been poking around some number pages lately, and I happened to notice that the claims made in the "In mythology" section are totally unsubstantiated.

The "Unreferenced" template message that I believe is supposed to address this was removed by an anonymous user on 05/05/2013. This user has only one other edit that removes a "citation needed" from the page on 38, also committed on 05/05/2013. I am not knowledgeable enough about editing Wikipedia to resolve this.

My hope is that in posting this to a talk page is that someone more qualified might apply a fix. If not, that's alright, but I think other people who may stumble across these pages deserve to know that the mythology sections are not supported by sources.

Regards,

2600:1700:3B80:32E0:6C11:7067:3DCC:1F39 (talk) 20:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ':' and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 7#':' until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:50, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]