Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tart 'n' Tinys

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. The article was mistakenly VFD-tagged as fictional. Mgm|^(talk) 08:46, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)

Tart 'n' Tinys

This is about a kind of sweet mentioned in a children's book. If its contents belong anywhere (which I doubt), they belong in the article on the book. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 18:20, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 18:20, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC) Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:16, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Believe it or not, they are real. The Willy Wonka Candy Company is an actual company that makes candy. They are the same people who make NERDS. DaveTheRed 19:01, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • And are now owned by Nestle, I think - David Gerard 01:39, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep real products from fictional-sounding companies. Kappa 19:08, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Oh, good grief, sorry. Do we have to go through the whole VfD farce, or would a friendly admin cut this short? (I have no idea what NERDS are either — but don't worry, I don't need to know. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 19:12, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• As it happens, we have an article for NERDS, too. :) —Korath (Talk) 19:35, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC) (keep)
• Keep (just adding another vote to make the decision for the friendly admin easier) Rl 21:28, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - David Gerard 01:39, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.