Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roth v United States

• Wikisource? - (Not the one who proposed this for deletion)Woodrow XXIII^II, Emperor of the United States, Minister of Ministry 21:35, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Cleanup. anthony (see warning) 21:46, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• I wish people would stop putting US Supreme Court opinions on the page varbatim. Transwiki and if anyone's up for it, a brief summary on the 'pedia page. For now, delete. Pteron 00:56, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Looks like source material. Dori | Talk 01:14, Apr 20, 2004 (UTC)
  • There's nothing wrong with source material which can be edited. anthony (see warning)
    • Yes there is - see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, point 14. Pteron 02:48, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Considering how Supreme Court opinions are freely available on the web, nothing is gained by just moving them here. When someone is ready to write an article on this case, they'll be able to easily find the source material elsewhere. Postdlf 6:22 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Source material. Delete. DJ Clayworth 14:39, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)

• Keep. Overwrote source material with stub. Please revisit Roth v. United States. -- Zigger 16:43, 2004 Apr 20 (UTC)
  • Yeah, it's ok now. Keep. Pteron 21:57, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Changed vote now it's an actual article rather than pure source. Postdlf 22:30 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Keep revision. Cribcage 05:41, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)