Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breadclip

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Any attempt to verify various combinations of words from this article lead mostly to a single article [1] Niteowlneils 05:07, 8 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete -- Cyrius|&#9998 05:09, May 8, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, idiocy. --Stormie 05:14, May 8, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Either obscure or joke. Andris 05:19, May 8, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, idiotic obscurity or hoax. DO'Neil 09:37, 8 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Joke, but not memorable enough for BJAODN. Andrewa 11:41, 8 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep. Now a good stub. I'm not entirely convinced it was worth the trouble, but if you guys want it, I'm cool with that. Andrewa 13:13, 8 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've replaced the silly article with a real stub. Abstain. - TB 11:43, 8 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Good call. Keep like this. Niteowlneils 00:33, 11 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Current version looks great! Dysprosia 11:51, 8 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Can't think of a precedent for this since I've been looking at VfD (which isn't long, a week or so). At first I thought it's like having an entry for doorknob or even nightstand as we had earlier. But if it's a patented little widget then perhaps it deserves an article. Gut instinct says that if this were to stay you would also need ping pong ball , keyring, lighter etc... And I wouldn't want that. --bodnotbod 13:07, May 8, 2004 (UTC)
    • Clothespin. Dysprosia 13:15, 8 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
    • Somebody somewhere knows who invented the ping-pong ball and when, what they're made of, what types you get and why you'd want to use each of them, and the current location of a dozen balls used in famous games. - TB 14:15, 8 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • I had never seen or heard of a bread clip before. Now I have. Perhaps other people might be interested? Rhymeless 05:36, 9 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I actually have a collection of the one-piece kind, maybe I'll add a picture later. DopefishJustin 21:22, May 9, 2004 (UTC)
  • God help me, I'm actually interested by this. Keep and expand. DS 02:43, 10 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
  • I still think it's dumb, but not dumb enough for deletion -- Cyrius|&#9998 03:13, May 10, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep It passes my standards for an article.(Real Info, Not Vanity, Wikified, etc) Burgundavia 07:34, May 13, 2004 (UTC)