Talk:Voyager 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateVoyager 2 is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 10, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
In the newsA news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on December 11, 2018.
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 20, 2004, August 24, 2004, August 25, 2004, August 25, 2005, August 25, 2006, August 25, 2009, and August 20, 2010.

Please check a source that looks funny[edit]

The "From Engineering To Big Science" source (currently #5) looks funny / off because it has a long segment written with it. Is this meant to be in the article? Would other editors please check this? Astrolabe 150c (talk) 00:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Voyager 2/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: The Herald (talk · contribs) 10:46, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Cambalachero (talk · contribs) 19:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Lead
  • Seems fine. The "as of April 2024" may be updated with the current numbers, but there's a hidden note of not doing so more than once a month, so I didn't touch anything. Is the idea to update it only when updating the month, to do it at some certain day, or some other precise system?
Images

On a general overview, the article has way too many images. Try to be a bit more selective.

History
  • You should link to Syzygy (astronomy), a planetary alignment.
  • Saturn has many moons. Why was the study of Titan so important that they even considered sending both Voyagers there?
  • Why link "The Earth" instead of just "Earth"?
  • "Scientific instruments" has an unresolved maintenance tag
Mission profile
  • Section is only a pair of giant images and a table, with no text.
Launch and trajectory
  • First paragraph has no references
  • File:Voyager 2 path.svg is unreadable at article size
  • File:Voyager 2 velocity vs distance from sun.svg, the first sentence is enough. The second is clarification and can go in a note, to reduce bloating.
  • Is it appropriate to place the images in the middle of the text? Why not at the end of the subsections, as below?
  • The second paragraph is only one line and a half long, and half of it is about Voyager 1.
  • "a complication arose" is a bit redundant, just explain directly what happened.
  • The paragraph ends with no reference
Encounter with Jupiter
  • Exploration of Jupiter is about all explorations of Jupiter, not just the Voyager 2. Use {{See also}} or {{Further}}, not {{Main}}.
  • The article is already using way too many images, but this is a bit over the top. 8 images below and 2 to the sides, 10 images in a section!
  • Link to Volcanism on Io
Encounter with Saturn
  • Again, "Exploration of..." is not a proper main article
  • Again, way too many images.
  • There are photos of Enceladus, Tethys, Titan, Iapetus, but not a single word about what did Voyager 2 saw when they were studied.
Encounter with Uranus
  • Again, "Exploration of..." is not a proper main article
  • Given the discussion about Uranus' axis, a link to Uranus#Axial_tilt may be appropriate.
  • Unlink "hypothesis", just a common word.
Encounter with Neptune

Will continue later. Cambalachero (talk) 18:17, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]