Talk:Burroughs B1700

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

[edit]

Wikified 1/30/05. ---B- 20:37, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Emulated Control store

I was one of the CPU designers for the B1965. The machine had no real "control store" in the normal sense of the word. It had a main memory, and an instruction cache on later models and the "micro-ops" were stored in the main memory along with interpreters, the OS (MCP), and user data/programs. The software stack "emulated" the writeable control store in main memory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ka6s (talk • contribs) 19:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CML versus CTL in B1700 series

I apparently am the one that added the CML comment. I was wrong. Burroughs did use CML in the BCML family of logic in some x800 series machines in medium/large systems, but never in the small systems. The logic family was called CTL and was similar to ECL.