User talk:Hob Gadling

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Per the notice near the top of that page, "When you start a discussion about an editor, you must leave a notice on their talk page. Pinging is not enough." I am sending you this message/notice on your Talk page. Cmsmith93 (talk) 23:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weird. --Hob Gadling (talk)

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

Hello, Hob Gadling. I am here to apoligise. i'd not be supprised if you had no clue who i am. but i am here to say sorry for referring to you as 'hobgoblin'. that is all my fault, sorry if it was insensitive. Babysharkboss2!! (Hells Bells (Talk Page btw)) 14:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That was not necessary. I can bear it. But thanks anyway. --Hob Gadling (talk) 14:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't call this the "the stupidest quackery of all". You're just tempting fate for someone to conjure up an even stupider one. DMacks (talk) 14:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New legal article[edit]

I have finished enough of Consciousness of guilt (legal) to go public with it. Further development and improvement will be appreciated. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Um... are you on the right Talk page? I have neither expertise nor a lot of interest in the subject. --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I, apparently mistakenly, thought it might interest you. Carry on. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 14:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Seeking a response on the proposal here. Thanks. AbsoluteWissen (talk) 13:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I were interested, I had responded. --Hob Gadling (talk) 13:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Climate change[edit]

Why did you revert my request for a citation to a statement that all theories on nonanthropogenic climate change are false? BBeagle (talk) 16:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New stuff goes to the bottom. Don't just insert it at a random place.
I wrote the reason in the edit summary: There is already a citation, at the end of the sentence. BTW, anthropogenic climate change has not been controversial in science for several decades. Only ideologically blinded, ignorant people disagree with it for self-serving reasons. Read Scientific consensus on climate change and Climate change denial. Also WP:FRINGE, WP:YWAB and WP:CHARLATANS. --Hob Gadling (talk) 19:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah right: This is what article talk pages are for, not user talk pages. --Hob Gadling (talk) 19:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Information icon Hi Hob Gadling! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Félix An (talk) 09:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  1. This is about the article, not about me.
  2. Check [1] to find out whether your claim you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times is true. It is very obviously not.
You are not welcome on my talk page. Please refrain from editing it in the future. --Hob Gadling (talk) 10:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]