Talk:DARPA LifeLog

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Web page[edit]

https://www.darpa.mil/ipto/Solicitations/PIP_03-30.html seems to be gone, but I found text that appears to be a direct copy of the original; it is now at LifeLog/PIP_03-30. If someone else will agree that it is acceptable to keep a copy here, then please edit the page accordingly. Such proposals are typically disseminated widely, so it is probably legal to have a copy of it. It has been in place for 8 months now at www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/924010/posts, according to the date on the page.

Scott McNay 20:05, 2004 Feb 22 (UTC)

The U.S. government cannot hold copyright, so it is certainly legal to copy documents produced by the Department of Defense. -- Beland 08:33, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Does anyone here find this NOT a bit frightening? This sounds like it has the potential to be the most invasive thing ever devised.--Shink X 00:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Criticism[edit]

One would expect massive criticism to something like this, but there is no section of that sort. What's going on here?2602:306:C559:8860:841F:1F31:C02:B274 (talk) 01:30, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia enforces a political bias. There is no point adding any personal gripes. 124.169.139.124 (talk) 03:16, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DARPA LifeLog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FB[edit]

At least a mention of the "dual use" US government sponsored (via legislation, access, shielding etc.) Facebook social network and the ilk should be mentioned here. See the setup dates for starters. Zezen (talk) 17:06, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is it true that Peter Thiel's early support for Facebook was, in part, an effort to create a website that duplicated the information-gathering functions that DARPA LifeLog had been trying to accomplish? Apparently Facebook was launched on the same day that DARPA LifeLog was shut down. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 23:37, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]