Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clementianism

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 14:31, May 7, 2005 (UTC)

Clementianism

Nonsense or original research, no google hits, delete--nixie 03:25, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Seconded. It's nonsense, POV, and original research at the same time Mcsweet 03:27, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, POV, original research. Megan1967 05:22, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Search in Altavista finds absolute zero hits. There clearly is no formally named movement or school of opinion called Clementianism. Down the flushatory with it. Delete. Anthony Appleyard 09:37, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - though well written, this looks like original research JoJan 18:24, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism, original research. Quale 22:14, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.