Talk:Corporate America (album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 22 May 2024[edit]

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

– No other article with the title "Corporate America" other than a disambiguation page. An actual article should be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Mika1h (talk) 16:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose WP:GNG is not met by the article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - most likely the album doesn't meet GNG, at best though this is clearly a WP:NOPRIMARY. estar8806 (talk) ★ 16:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - @Zxcvbnm:@Estar8806: I added more reviews to the article. I think it passes GNG now. --Mika1h (talk) 23:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, this is a charting album by a major band. Much like video games, it simply suffers from its sources being locked away in print media because it released in the early 2000s. There's no way this fails an AFD or a merge discussion, we should concentrate on a path forward with it existing instead. Sergecross73 msg me 14:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]