Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Menomena

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:39, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

Menomena

Bandcruft. Notability not established in article. Kelly Martin 04:19, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete -- Speedy Delete if no one objects. Vanity. --Chiacomo 04:23, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:NMG. Their website is very very ugly. --bainer 05:00, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, band vanity. Megan1967 05:20, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as band vanity. -Jamyskis 12:02, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. PedanticallySpeaking 16:28, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Keep and cleanup. The article is terrible but I doubt its band vanity. Probably released artist: see here and the 23,800 Google hits for Menomena. That said, [www.menomena.com their website] isn't for the epileptic. 20:27, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. Allmusic has writeup, and album in national release. so they reach notable. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 21:27, 2005 May 13 (UTC)
• Delete unless it is improved to meet the music-importance criteria. Vegaswikian 07:25, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep has completed a national tour of the US and released an album according to their Allmusic.com article. [1] Capitalistroadster 08:51, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vain. Radiant_* 12:47, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete →Iñgōlemo← ^talk 04:51, 2005 May 18 (UTC)
• Keep for the reasons that Capitalistroadster listed. Clearly Diluted 02:58, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.