Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbazonoid

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. (Deleted and moved to WP:BJADON) -- AllyUnion (talk) 13:48, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Barbazonoid[edit]

Patent nonsense about an imaginary creature. Web search on goole turns up no hits whatsoever.Simon 17:46, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)

~~Keep~~ — Disregarding this mythical creature is denouncing the aligibility of religion and the self's right for freedom of belief. Since google is not into searching in Aramic, there is no reason for it to show any entry on this marvelous and mysterious creature. I strongly protest this dark attempt to eliminate any trace of this animal in one of the only strongholds of human knowledge - the wikipedia. voting off this entry is an insult for intelligence and for those who seek it. 17:59, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Note: Above vote was made by 212.143.70.168 on 01:59, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC). Unregistered and unsigned votes do not count. --Andylkl 11:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)

"Nonsense" is right. So we have an office-dwelling, platypusesque creature, first seen in Constantinople, and we're supposed to be searching for it an "Aramic"? You do know they spoke Greek in Constantinople, right? This article is utter crap. Delete, speedily would be fine. -R. fiend 18:59, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Concur, delete or speedy. Nicely formatted though. Kappa 19:12, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete — Appears 2B nonsense. Rubik's cube induced hysteria. — RJH 20:22, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete, nonsense. --Carnildo 20:46, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep, I heard people using that word. Chatool 20:26, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a nonsense-writers' email group. Flush it down the toiletatory. Anthony Appleyard 20:31, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Keep, I think i saw this creature once or twice . Tiresiasss 20:49, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This is the user's first and only edit. --Carnildo 21:29, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Move to BJAODN and delete. =) --Andylkl 11:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Hoax/vandalism. — Gwalla | Talk 01:20, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Patent nonsense, belongs to BJAODN. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 16:58, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete but put in BJAODN cuz its funny. -CunningLinguist 09:19, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
BJAODN. Megan1967 07:58, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Move to BJAODN. JamesBurns 11:25, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I don't think we should trash a name as funny sounding as "Barbazonoid". Move to BJAODN. -- Riffsyphon1024 11:30, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.