Talk:Operational definition
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Operational definition article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
wizzito | say hello! suspects that this article (specifically this version) may be a copyright violation, but without a source this cannot be definitively determined. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2018 and 17 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): 8DBienaime.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Confusing, overly technical language
[edit]Template:Confusing was placed atop this article in January 2018, for good reasons. Some of the language is also overly technical. I began to edit the article for improved clarity (diff). Let's discuss edits to improve the clarity, precision, and comprehensibility of the article here. My expertise is in psychology, so not surprisingly my edits cited references from the psychology literature. If other scientific disciplines explain "operational definition" differently, please add that information with citations to reliable sources. Thanks! Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) [he/his/him] 03:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
who molested this page
[edit]This page used to explain operational definitions as used in science in a concise and clear way. Right now it looks like an exercise in disinformation to prevent readers from understanding the concept. Can we revert it to a sane state, please? Vaceituno (talk) 08:52, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class psychology articles
- Mid-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class philosophy of science articles
- Low-importance philosophy of science articles
- Philosophy of science task force articles
- Start-Class philosophy of language articles
- Low-importance philosophy of language articles
- Philosophy of language task force articles
- Start-Class Linguistics articles
- Unknown-importance Linguistics articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles