Talk:Vogliatemi bene

This redirect falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles

Songs

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

The most famous?

I don't agree. I think it could be Un bel di vedremo --195.76.142.130 10:13, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC) es:User:Jdiazch

Re: candidate to be moved to wikisource

I don't think we should move this article. It covers more than just the text, and, as the article states, it is a very famous aria. Other arias have their own articles; for instance, Nessun Dorma. Moreover, the recording by Maria Callas is a significant work in the world of opera. The libretti should be covered in wikisource; the famous arias should be allowed to remain here on wikipedia. Wikisource is for texts, not for articles about texts. RedRabbit1983 14:14, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

???

This is not an aria! is a section of a duet.... an article about a section of a duet?! --Al Pereira (talk) 02:15, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a rather ridiculous article. It is not an aria, and the mention of Callas is questionable. Also, I would hardly describe Butterfly as verismo. This should be severly shorn and merged with the main article, which I will do shortly. --203.129.50.179 09:14, 30 June 2007 (UTC) After I remember to log in. --Alexs letterbox 09:18, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely agree. --Al Pereira (talk) 09:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

??? second part

I don't see any reason to have an article about a section of a duet. In addition to this, the article doesn't say anything. --Al Pereira (talk) 05:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And it is not the most famous part of the duet. --Al Pereira (talk) 05:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, there is nothing special or famous about this part at all. It should be merged with the main article - Jay (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]