Wikipedia:Peer review/Book of Esther/archive1
This text needs to be differentiated from the possibly historical figure Esther. The additions to the text need to be discussed. The interpretations of Esther as a didactic fiction as well as a literalist historical document need to be neutrally assessed. There is a Rabbinic tradition that is untouched. I have done what I can. your help is needed. --Wetman 04:32, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Wetman, may I suggest you'll get better and more relevant response to this type of problem if you take it to the article content section of Request for comment, which is specifically for editing disagreements. Peer review is primarily for getting near-FA quality articles up to FA standard. No offense, I hope. Bishonen | Talk 07:47, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)