Talk:Caterpillar (Alice's Adventures in Wonderland)

Novels: Fantasy / 19th century Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by 19th century task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Animals in media (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animals in media, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Animals in mediaWikipedia:WikiProject Animals in mediaTemplate:WikiProject Animals in mediaAnimals in media articles

Sammy Davis Jr. Sorry, not sure how this works exactly, but the article should include something about Sammy Davis Jr.'s role as the caterpillar. Just saying AH — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.203.108.185 (talk) 16:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

I have recently read Alice in Wonderland. I checked it out from the library, and found it a most difficult book to read. Much of it made no sense. However, I did conclude that Carol was a drug user. I mean, the mushroom, the hookah. There are so many things about that book that could most undeniably be a trip on shrooms or acid. The Disney movie didn't help much either, with all the colors and everything all over the place. I've done shrooms once and I didn't like it, but once was enough to be able to associate the trip with the movie. I mean, I felt like I was lost in some sort of wonderland. Then I watched the movie while I was on it. You do weird things, like my girlfreind. I went up to her and held her hand while on it. She looked at me and just said, "why are you touching me?" not angry, just asking. As I look back, that just reminds me of the way the characters were in the movie, and book. It's hard to explain if you've never done them, I just wanted someone elses opinion. I was just wondering if anyone else agrees with me. Perhaps someone has read other more intellegent peoples theories as to why this seems to be a drug users story.

A typical attitude of modern day drug users towards children stories with fantasy elements... seriously, opium was a common recreational substance (it is also what the caterpillar smoked, hence forgetting things), legal at that time in Britain, according to my knowledge. 82.139.47.117 12:17, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Carroll had a marvelous imagination, plus he was an expert in mathematical logic, which enabled to construct a number of paradoxes. Also, things that appear senseless to modern readers were intended as satires of current events and would have been recognized as such by Carroll's contemporaries, according to Martin Gardner. There is no reason to hypothesize drug use. He probably intended older readers to recognize the Caterpillar as a drug addict ( who were legal but despised at the time); that did not imply that Carroll was. It's a bad idea to try to interpret an imaginative literary work with an impaired mind (including forgetting to sign one's post).CharlesTheBold (talk) 03:25, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Opium would indeed have been available in Victorian Britain, but there are stories much older- Little Red Riding Hood, which encourages transvetism, or Goldilocks, which encourages intrusion, theft and vandalism- that could be equally construde as unsuitable to children, but few parents discourage the reading of them. I also would dispute the fact that either of the Alice books are difficult to understand. If you do find them difficult, however, I would recommend another book, "The Annotated Alice" by Martin Gardner. Anything that is too "Victorian English" for any reader now will become instantly clear on reading it, I think. CO.

All I want to know is what is the caterpiller's name? Is it just "The Caterpiller" or what? KS

Spelling?

Absalom or Absolem? This page uses the latter, but the former is used in other Wikipedia pages linking here. Vpw (talk) 18:24, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]