Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BTE

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 09:18, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

BTE[edit]

A mostly-unverifiable article about a Linux distribution that hasn't released anything. Looks a lot like vanity to me. CDC (talk) 23:05, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Unverifiable (the only proof of existence is a text file on a p2p network?), and non notable (no releases yet) -- taviso 09:57, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- They are just trying to give the distribution Exigo a bad name. --193.216.24.197 19:13, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- They are lying that Exigo might be Closed Source.And they use this page to humiliate Exigo and Exigo-devs --213.119.93.240 20:26, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- They are only out to give a Exigo a bad name! --68.234.79.140 20:33, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Idem as ^^
Don't Delete -- The page doesn't say Exigo is closed source anywhere. The page is not out to give Exigo a bad name: It's out to tell people about BTE. Since one of BTE's goals is to be "Better Than Exigo," it's hard to write an article about BTE that doesn't mention Exigo... Also, the BTE devs put up a website at http://nandu.berlios.de so there is a source for the article now.
- Comment made by 66.31.245.175

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.