Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/At The Hip

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 03:07, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

At The Hip[edit]

Information here sounds very dubious. Contributor claims that the information is based on "inside industry information" that he cannot verify. Thus it is either false or unencyclopedaic. — Adam Conover † 00:44, May 12, 2005 (UTC) (Read the entry on Abigail and Brittany Hensel for insight into why the information in this article is highly dubious.) — Adam Conover † 00:56, May 12, 2005 (UTC)

Found source. [1]

No, that source is full of copies of Wikipedia content that violate GFDL. It's listed at Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks/GFDL Compliance under a compliance level of "Low: Fail[s] in a very significant way such as claiming their own copyright without including a GFDL notice". Go to juiceenewsdaily and see at all the "Who is" articles that are copies of Wikipedia biographies... There's absolutely no verification of this other than from Wikipedia mirrors or Wikipedia thieves. Delete. Samaritan 02:57, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unverified, unlikely, and the only "source" has stolen Wikipedia material ("Saved by the Bell" version of 13:38 27 April 2005 to be specific) and claimed it as its own copyrighted work.

Do Not Delete - the information has been sourced. Difficulty finding more citations on Google? This is one instance where Wikipedia is ahead of the curve, we should be proud. 70.177.90.39 07:43, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The information has been "sourced" from a copy of Wikipedia material. A shortly upcoming ABC network sitcom about conjoined twin teens who solve mysteries (!) would have been discussed somewhere else on the interweb. Samaritan 14:48, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unverifiable. R adiant _* 09:05, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Delete for shocking level of unverifiability. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 18:42, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.