User talk:NeonMerlin/archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:NeonMerlin. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Welcome!

Hello, NeonMerlin/archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

And here's something to know; please understand the difference between a user page and a user talk page. Georgia guy 16:36, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Block

Thanks for your e-mail. I'm surprised that you were affected by the block on 207.35.188.13 (talk · contribs); I'd understood that opening an account meant that IP-address blocks wouldn't affect you. I'll ask around, and try to find out what happened. The block has expired now, so I assume that everything's OK? Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 18:56, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Blocked?

Are you currently able to edit? You should be. The block on User:38.116.192.13 is still in effect, but there is no block on your username. If you can't edit, something's funny. android 79 05:44, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Alice obstrum

This article makes no sense, and it reads like patent nonsense. Is it? - SimonP 03:43, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

Please don't do such things, it is considered vandalism. - SimonP 20:49, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Danger

Template:Danger has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Danger. Thank you. --cesarb 02:16, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Brainwashing and Mind Control

Please take part at the merge vote under Talk:Mind control#Merge vote --Irmgard 16:19, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Cotw-screen.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Cotw-screen.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 04:10, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

The game itself has been released PD, and I took the screen shot myself. Does that mean I hold the copyright, or is the screen shot ineligible? Seahen 04:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

That's an interesting question, actually - I just asked on WPT:ICT. Just thought you'd be interested in knowing. :) -- Schnee (cheeks clone) 00:42, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

I've put it back, because I'm at least sure it's fair use or better, if I don't uphold copyright to it (which I don't). Seahen 00:52, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Convention of using Nuvola icons

Where can I read more about it? --logixoul 06:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Pardon my French, but when exactly has such a standard been passed? I don't see any reason to change the icons of a random selection of stubs, since editors and stub sorters are used to them. It is a particularly bad idea regarding the flags, since some of us at WP:WSS (particularly me) have been working hard in bringing order to the original mess regarding the flag icons. It'll look very bad when articles are double- or even triple-stubbed, if some of these stubs use a "straight" flag and others a waving flag. Such articles are all over the place. For what I can see, the Nuvola package doesn't have icons for all nations, particularly not icons of a similar design. Moreover, it would have been a nice idea to debate any largescale edits with WP:WSS since we're the ones maintaining the stub templates. Regards. Valentinian ^(talk) 16:19, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

I've reverted the edits to the templates using flags. Please do not undo them unless consulting with WP:WSS first. At the moment, the system is consistent, and we'd like to keep it that way. Regards. Valentinian ^(talk) 16:43, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Image:Mariostar.gif

Moved to Image talk:Mariostar.gif Seahen 22:48, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Template:Windows-stub

File:Nuvola samba Windows.png is not fair use. It is GFDL, because it is part of File:Nuvola devices samba unmount.png, which in turn is part of the GFDLed Nuvola icon set. This means it is free to use on Template:Windows-stub. If you have any further questions, I would appreciate them on my talk page. Seahen 19:59, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

You can't claim "GFDL" while at the same time infringing on someone else's trademark. The item in question is a near-perfect copy of a trademarked logo[1], and as such isn't considered a "creative work" under United States copyright law. It's actually a form of trademark infringement, which can open up Wikimedia to litigation, and that can't be allowed. You're going to find that Wikipedia will put up a lot of resistance to such an image being used, so please, don't bother with this. Warrens 23:36, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

If I'm infringing on a trademark with this logo, then so is David Vignoni (creator of Nuvola), who claims he can release the above icon under the GFDL. Seahen 00:15, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

You may want to learn more about U.S. fair use doctrine before making such claims. One of the central points of fair use doctrine is the quantity or percentage of the original copyrighted work that makes up the new work. Refer to Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, and Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enters, among other decisions. Thus it is entirely possible that the first image is copyright infringement, but the second image falls under fair use. The trademark issue is completely separate. Kaldari 07:21, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Userbox

Even though this user uses userboxes, they prefer not to be associated with userbox zealots who defend offensive and obscene userboxes.

Here you go, though may I please suggest you tone down the wording before reusing it? (By the way, I would have subst'ed it onto your userpage, but my browser froze trying to load it. That page is huge.) Dmcdevit·t 03:29, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Then this is what I'll use. Seahen 20:42, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

This user prefers to limit sexually explicit content to the article namespace.

User Box 2

Are you an Icon maker? I need a new User Box Due to the fact I was looking at the history of the Wikipedia "Icon"-article page today, I was on your User Page. I thought I'd contact you because I'd like to find someone to make a new User Box [2]. Personally, I have no experience or expertise/knowledge for attempting to make one myself (not an artist at all).

I'd like to see a User Box for: "users who enjoy Cross-Country Skiing" As you may guess, these are pastimes that some of us in the North enjoy, and I believe there would be others with User Pages who also enjoy this recreation/sport [3] and might put the Box on their page.

Thanks for considering my request. Joel Russ 16:17, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Code monkey question

Just out of curiousity, why the change of image? was the second drawing Len did, and (in both his opinion and mine) better fits the song than File:Code Monkey colour.jpg does. As to which more resembles the typical code monkey, I'd say the both have issues. The code monkeys I've seen tend to dress in button-up shirts and slacks; generally it's the hackers who are the ones programming without any pants... scot 15:01, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

I chose the first, because it was in full colour and contained additional elements (such as the code backdrop and the computer monitor). But it doesn't have to be one or the other. I see three other options:

The article could use both images, despite their similarities.
I could rework (the license allows derivs), colouring it and adding some code similar to what's in File:Code Monkey colour.jpg.
We could use a different image altogether [4], but we'd probably have to settle for fair use.

What do you think should be done? Seahen 03:43, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

I could swear I replied to this last week; maybe the "Save page" request didn't go through...

I think either of the first two would work. I used the low-color image because it does better fit the "Code Monkey" song, which is about an under-appreciated programmer (sense 3, frustrated "Don't ask me, I'm just a code monkey" type usage). The color drawing looks more to me like a sense 1 code monkey, due to the blank stare. I put in a link to a ThinkGeek Code Monkey T-shirt which looks more like a sense 2 use (though I object to being called a "sixer"). scot 15:09, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Template:User The Sims

Hi there, noticed you recently changed the language used on the above mentioned template. Was there a reason for this? It really should remain in english and I cannot see a reason why changing the template to a foreign language is suitable. Enigmatical 01:21, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

It's not a foreign language, it's Simlish! Seahen 01:39, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Well in the future it might be a good idea to actually include a description of your edit so that people understand what you are doing. Enigmatical 01:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

{{reqphoto}} in Sildenafil

What picture(s) are needed? DMacks 04:35, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Just a pill, and maybe the packaging as well. Seahen 23:20, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Game

Why does your bot tell me that the "Definitions" heading and the Template:Wiktionary that follows it are out of order?! Seahen 03:26, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Someone inappropriately used subst: on an 1911 Britannica template, causing a link to "Category:1911 Britannica" to appear directly above the "Definitions" header, where it does not belong. Someone has subsequently fixed it. -- Beland 18:19, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

I substed it so that I could change "article" to "section." Why wasn't there a Template:Sect1911 or anything until just now?

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians which you have included on your user page has been proposed for deletion you can comment at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Wikipedians by mental condition. The is also a proposal to create an association to meet the needs of users with mental health conditions. --Salix alba (talk) 18:56, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: Merge Template

Wait can you refresh my memory of what you are referring to?- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 11:18, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

The focus of the Strategy game article was really the computer games and only gave peripheral attention to other forms. The Game of strategy article really focused on the what the purpose and objective of a general type of game. I feel that what was said in one wouldn't necessarily apply in the other.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 11:28, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Re:Unblocking

If your IP is blocked, there's unfortuantly nothing we can do. Sorry, hopefull the block will expire soon. Sasquatch t|c 04:52, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:MS Sam.ogg

Thanks for uploading Image:MS Sam.ogg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:05, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Game

No, it wasn't exactly copyediting, I shouldn't have called it that in the summary. However, the reason I did the replacements was to create consistency, I really hate to see hedgehogs when it is very easy to make it hedgehogs. I think the latter is more aesthetically pleasing. Emmett5 20:33, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice, I'll stop being so indiscriminate in piping. Emmett5 21:43, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ambigram Wikipedia.png

Sorry, the image Image:Ambigram Wikipedia.png does not belong on WP:IFD, as it is a Commons image. It hasn't existed here locally since April 29, it appears. If you want it deleted, I suggest deletion requests on Commons. Thank you for your understanding. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject Award

I noticed that you added your PUA for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer and video games to the wikiproject page. The reason I did this is because of no support or a lack of consensus during the debate about the award for your project. You can check out the archive. The informal protocol is that all awards posted to the barnstar, wikiproject or award pages be vetted first. I suggest you post the award again and get some support for your proposal. --evrik 15:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank You

Hello Seahen and thank you for the welcome and compliment concerning my editing of Game. Part of the hassle of Wikipedia (to me) is how a world of people who all use grammar differently must constantly compromise on how articles should be written. All of the WP guidelines in the universe won't change members' needs to rearrange as they see fit even if the change is incorrect. However, I suppose it balances out most often. Just as you did not agree with all of my edits, I did not agree with all of yours (though your edits did show me one big mistake my rephrasing made/missed), but checks and balances is what the site is all about! Best regards, CobraWiki 17:57, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Protocols image

Seahen, the 2005 edition of the Syrian Protocols was obviously not available in 1923, and it is the 2005 edition that we want to illustrate. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 17:04, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Why the 2005 Protocols? The book itself hasn't changed since it was first published, has it? If not, then the article could depict the same book just as well with an older cover. Seahen 17:08, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 10th


Volume 2, Issue 28	10 July 2006	About the Signpost

Reuters tracks evolution of Ken Lay's death on Wikipedia	Creating stable versions using existing software proposed
Meetups And Newsworthy International Assemblages	News and Notes: Blocking changes, privacy policy update
Wikipedia in the News	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report On Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Signpost delivered by: Roy Boy ⁸⁰⁰ 04:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Red link

I've deleted the redirect you created at red link; that page is used on various Wikipedia pages as an example of, well, a red link. Placing a redirect, or any other content, there makes the link blue, which rather defeats the point. For further discussion, see Talk:Red link. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 14:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Exactly what on Talk:Red link persuaded you to do this? I see no such suggestion there. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 17:48, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry. I made the relevant talk page comment after I finished the batch of edits. I had been under the false impression that the edits themselves would take a trivial amount of time, on the order of 15 minutes, but they took much longer. I guess I'm not accustomed to the slower 'Net connection at my mom's house. _SeahenNeon Merlin 18:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Umm, huh? That doesn't answer his question. There was no edit war going on. One user simply complained about why his content was deleted, until he was informed of the reason. Also, when undertaking a project, it is considered polite to discuss it first, and get group opinions before beginning the editing process. -- kenb215 00:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

That user wasn't the first to attempt to create the page, and if we keep using red link as an example red link, he won't be the last. _SeahenNeon Merlin 02:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Terencemckenna.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Terencemckenna.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 17th


Volume 2, Issue 29	17 July 2006	About the Signpost

Library of Congress, Holocaust Museum negotiate with Wikimedia	Issue of article subjects requesting deletion taken up
Meetups And Newsworthy International Assemblages	News and Notes: Blocking changes, single login
Wikipedia in the News	Features and admins
The Report On Lengthy Litigation


Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	RSS Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. --Michael Snow 05:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Question in it.wiki

Hi, I have preferred to answer here. Ciao --Biopresto 13:31, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Requests for protection

Hi, there. I'm just informing you that you placed your request for protection at WP:RFP at the incorrect location in the 'fulfilled/denied requests' section at the bottom, instead of the 'new requests' section at the top. I moved it to the proper location once, but it appears you accidentally missed it and now there are two listings for it. :) Cowman109^Talk 03:50, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Article creation

Please do not create 'The weather in London' as an article again. This is deliberately left as an uncreated article, linked from some pages to show that it is a title inappropriate for Wikipedia. See Talk:The weather in London for details. PS: Since you ask, it's over 30 degrees, bright sunshine, though there are some clouds. The temperature is slightly lower than yesterday. David | Talk 14:28, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

I've raised this at the administrator's noticeboard. David | Talk 14:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 24th


Volume 2, Issue 30	24 July 2006	About the Signpost

From the editor: Special report, writers wanted
Another country reportedly blocks Wikipedia	School files suit against anonymous user(s)
Meetups And Newsworthy International Assemblages	Wikipedia featured in The New Yorker
Election officials named to handle vote for board seat	Report from the German Wikipedia
News and Notes: Biographies of living persons, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	The Report On Lengthy Litigation


Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	RSS Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. --Michael Snow 04:33, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Simsville; Lobster thermidor; 1982 in games; Tanktics; Widget Workshop; Pac-Man Fever (album); SimGolf; SimMars; Beauty salon; Norihiko Hibino; SimLife; Entex Select-A-Game; 1987 in games; Rosebud (The Simpsons); 2001 in games; SimHealth; SimCity 64; List of video game mascots; Bases Loaded II

Cleanup: Command & Conquer series; Fashion accessory; 2003 in games
Merge: The Last Temptation of Homer; Car game; Side-scrolling game
Add Sources: SimFarm; The Sims Online; Super Mario Bros. (film)
Wikify: Uploading and downloading; Floristry; Holy Magic Century
Expand: Everyplot; Sodium carbonate; Trivial Pursuit

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 11:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Toursim in Japan

Hi NeonMerlin,

You put a copyright violation template on the article Tourism in Japan, to which I contributed. My contributions are certainly original, and they are present in the external web site. So, I think the copying is in reverse, that is, the external site copied the Wikipedia article. What do you think?

Fg2 21:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)