Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power word

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - should be merged - SimonP 21:24, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)

Power word[edit]

Neologism. There are a ton of sites that use the term "power word" but none that use it in the sense used here ("a form of loaded language"). 216.131.220.133 01:02, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Rename. -- Change to "Loaded language". It's a useful collection of words and phrases. — Xiong (talk) 22:07, 2005 Mar 18 (UTC)
Rename. Unless someone posts some better arguments for this page here, then I will reconsider my vote. --Grouse 01:17, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Move ~~to loaded language~~. Scratch that, we already have loaded (language) and loaded language should refer to the same article. This article needs a new title, but "loaded language" isn't it. This is more specific. — Gwalla | Talk 01:25, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This may be trivial, but the concept of 'power words' is valid (if minor) in D&D and the Amber Diceless role playing game. If this gets renamed (which sounds good) the original title might disambig or redirect or something. Radiant _* 14:10, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
Merge to loaded language, then either redirect there or disambiguate per Radiant!'s suggestion. -Sean Curtin 02:13, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)
Merge as above w Sean Curtin. (Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 18:44, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Merge. Good content, but duplicated. Chamaeleon 01:00, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Merge, per Sean Curtin's suggestion. -Willmcw 18:56, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.