Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quercetani

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Korath (Talk) 01:16, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)

Quercetani

• Apparently a Venetian luthier. Delete, non-notable, mis-titled, unverifiable. Slac speak up! 05:34, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 08:45, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• "Unverifiable"? Google is your friend: [1], [2], [3] and more. Well, verifiably not Venetian: he works in Parma, as the article says. Parma is quite some way from Venice, and I don't know how Venice got into this at all. "Mis-titled"? Certainly, and I'd rush to retitle it, but this would throw a spanner into the VfD process. "Possible vanity"? Perhaps 70% or more of new articles are possible vanity, but what makes you think that the possibility here is more than negligible? Admittedly our man hasn't kicked a ball around in front of a US audience or appeared as a Pokemon character (two ironclad guarantees of notability in WP, it seems), but keep. -- Hoary 10:48, 2005 Mar 29 (UTC)
• Keep luthiers who found schools. Cleanup as necessary Kappa 19:13, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: I hope I'm correct in assuming Kappa means "keep luthiers who establish schools", not "luthiers who managed to find a school which would accept them." Barno 21:49, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Concur w/ User:Hoary. Changed vote to Keep and re-title. Slac speak up! 06:04, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep An important contemporary luthier who’s instruments are obviously in demand and will likely maintain or increase their value. Need more aticles on current luthers like this one. Paradiso 07:50, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Looks notable to me. Keep and allow for melodic growth. Radiant_* 09:10, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and eventually retitle. Well done to Hoary for his research on an important figure in contemporary classicla music. Capitalistroadster 10:00, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • [Cough] Already retitled, actually (by Paradiso). And thank you for the kind words, but really, the "research" took mere seconds. I suspect that Slac was just sleepy: I know that seeing article after article of vanity and trivia can do in my brain to the point where I hardly notice when the next article is actually worthwhile, and I don't suppose I'm unusual. -- Hoary 10:11, 2005 Mar 30 (UTC)
• Keep re-written article. --Carnildo 19:36, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.