Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhyne
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was TRANSWIKI AND DELETE
Rhyne[edit]
This looks like a Wiktionary entry, and will almost certainly never look like more than a Wiktionary entry. Transwiki? Grutness|hello? 
00:14, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Transwiki to Wiktionary. Agreed, this doesn't look like it will be any more than a Wiktionary entry. --Deathphoenix 06:39, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Transwikii and Delete, dicdef. Wyss 06:44, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- It is an accurate dictionary definition, but even as someone who knows a lot about them (I live on the edge of the Somerset Levels and part of my job relates to the Somerset Levels Environmentally Sensitive Area), I can't think how it can be expanded to an encyclopedic article. The whole drainaige system could become an article (or a section in the Somerset Levels article), but that would be about more than just rhynes - including field-drains, ditches, rhynes, rivers, Internal Drainage Boards, biodiversity, history, flood management, etc. If such an article/section is ever written then Rhyne can be made a redirect to it. For now I vote to transwiki to wiktionary. Thryduulf 22:36, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - could be made into an interesting and informative article. I expanded it a little beyond the definition stage, but I know little about them. The Steve 07:00, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.