Archives:1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 90 days
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
United States Armed Forces was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I am questioning the need for a section in the article infobox that is titled "Industry". With all the flags and the length of the list wouldn't be better presented in the body of the article under the title of perhaps "International suppliers". Just asking for a friend...Cuprum17 (talk) 20:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 22 April 2024[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Requires copyediting to remove tag which is there more then a year now! 64.189.18.24 (talk) 05:58, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 12:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For the article, "U.S. Armed Forces, the U.S. Secretary of Defense is not listed at all. The Secretary of Defense is General Lloyd Austin, III, (Ret.)
The "chief minister" field is currently "broken" after this edit to the template. Hold off manually fixing it for now; I'm going to check with the editor to see why this change was needed and if we can just revert their edit (which would be much easier than going out and fixing every instance of the template). Liu1126 (talk) 20:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done After discussion, the edit to the template has been reverted. Liu1126 (talk) 22:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]