Talk:OSF/1

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Software: Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

"Intellectual property" can be a loaded word. Is there any reason we don't simply say "...now belongs to Hewlett-Packard."?

Also, I don't really care for the expression "became known as Digital Unix". That makes it sound like the users decided to call it that. IIRC, Digital simply renamed it. Is my memory right? Why not simply "and renamed 'Digital Unix'."?

Good points - I also tinkered to make it flow a little better; notabilities to lead, and more of a continuous narrative for history. Earlier writers probably found it hard to explain, because both OSF/1 and Dunix existed simultaneously. Stan 13:21, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)