Talk:Kim Jong-chul

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: will be moved when the redirect is deleted. Kotniski (talk) 10:17, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kim Jong-chul (political figure)Kim Jong-chul — Clearly the primary topic in terms of sources and page views. Disambiguation page can be substituted with a hatnote. [1] Only about a dozen or so of these are about the poet and the majority of the rest are about the son of Kim Jong il. -- Marcus Qwertyus 04:12, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support as there's more sources for the son of Kim Jong il. GoodDay (talk) 05:52, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, I agree that he is the primary topic at this point. Recury (talk) 20:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Old history[edit]

Please see Talk:Kim Jong-chul/old for the old history of this article. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:40, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A thought occured...[edit]

So, I'm reading around about the Kim's, and I notice that Kim Jong-un is the "heir presumptive" in his wiki, whereas it states on Kim Jong-Il's and Jong-chul's wiki that he is the successor being groomed up? I think since there is no definitive proof for either one, that all articles on the Kims be scanned to remove certainty from the contents to abstain from opinion. I'm going to suggest this on Jong-un and Jon-Il's page. In liue of the removed bits, we can simply note that there is obvious dispute between which child will receive the successorship (doubtful his daughter will because Korean traditions and customs, especially for the elitist classes, but we can't rule it out). Joshua Torelli (talk) 22:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kim Jong-chul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kim Jong-chul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Kim Ju-ae which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 06:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]