Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoffrey Bell

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. JeremyA 05:09, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Geoffrey Bell

Delete. Another obvious vanity article that, unfortunately, can't be speedied. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 03:30, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete -- "Obsessed with Wikipedia"? Well, he's not all bad. --Tysto 03:40, 2005 Jun 3 (UTC)
• Delete and why not speedy? We all know that no one is going to vote to keep this for legitimate reasons. --Barfooz (talk) 03:53, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Patent vanity. jni 07:00, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Another vanity article of a non-notable high school student. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 09:09, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. JamesBurns 09:29, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete insufferable vanity. --Etacar11 17:06, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Insufferable? Probably. Knows it all? Probably not. 216.158.31.195 17:12, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Okay, they say not to give your full name out over the internet, but I regret to inform you that this is about me. I had nothing to do with its creation; my friend did that without telling me first (my response: "I'm gonna list it on Votes for Deletion!"). I'll add that it's all true, and that I hope I won't always be non-notable ;-) --Theaterfreak64 21:31, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
  • In that case, have your friend slap a {{db|deletion requested by sole contributor}} on it. There's no reason to keep this around. (Also, tell your "friend" that posting personal information about you under your real name really ought to be your decision.) AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 21:58, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
    • Perhaps I should have mentioned that, upon hearing about it, another of my friends came along and added the second paragraph. Any ideas? --Theaterfreak64 23:25, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
      • I guess this one gets to wait it out, then. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 23:42, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. NeoJustin 02:22, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
• Err, the speedy tag goes on the article, and the one I suggested above no longer applies, because more than one editor has contributed to the article's content. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 01:51, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.