User talk:Rdash/May-December 2004

Hi Rdash, you can move them yourself if you're not an admin, just click on "move this page." If you've already moved some manually I can help you fix those, just let me know which ones. Adam Bishop 22:09, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rogers Sportsnet...I just made a minor change to your additions: CTV wasn't yet owned by Bell Globemedia when it started Sportsnet, so I changed those references to CTV Television Network instead. Bell Globemedia didn't come into being until 2000, the year after CTV sold Sportsnet to Rogers. Bearcat 00:56, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

About Mad Mad House, according to [1], it is Canadian. I know that site isn't 100% reliable but I know it is most of the time. SD6-Agent 21:52, 5 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

A Canadian firm is involved in the production of the series, but it's not considered a Canadian series, in the same way that C.S.I. isn't considered a Canadian series even though it's produced by Alliance Atlantis. Bearcat 21:59, 5 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I have used your WikiProject table for my local stations (WKRG and WPMI). I would have done WEAR but someone made it automatically redirect to Sinclair Broadcasting. TheCustomOfLife 19:05, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I also created pages for my old local stations, using your chart: WJXX, WTEV, and WTLV. I've joined the Wikiproject. TheCustomOfLife 20:29, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing[edit]

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)