Talk:Gas sculpture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article looks like a similar sort of thing to Four dimensional painting - if this is all there is to say about it, I don't think it should be an article at all. If Miro is the only artist to have proposed/written about this, then the info should really be in the Miro page, IMO. It's silly to have articles about every idea every person ever has, especially if there's nothing to be said about them beyond "Person X had idea Y". --Camembert

These should both be on the Miro page where they have some context and don't just seem like hot air (little art joke there). Ortolan88
With the recent update this page might be worth keeping as separate. --141.219.41.163 19:57 Jan 27, 2003 (UTC)

This page is definitely worth keeping if someone could add why the, "supposed 'gas sculpture' at the Universe Zone at the American Museum of Natural History," "is not truly a gas sculpture."-Hyacinth


Why is Peter Willberger being trashed like this? Is he just a liar? It doesn't sound that hard to make a gas sculpture, just shoot some air through some liquid. I've done it with a straw and a coke thousands of times. --Anon

I removed that statement. Google test did not turn up much on that guy. --Menchi 00:15, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I should note that Robert Morris (who also has a wiki page but i am html illiterate so excuse me) has done a gas sculpture i believe it was titled "steam" say 1967 or so. Ndwright 04:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)nico[reply]

27/10/11[edit]

Just changed the "Gas sculpture is a proposal made by Joan Miró in his late writings to make sculpture out of gaseous materials." to "Gas sculpture is a proposal made by Joan Miró in his late writings to make sculptures out of gaseous materials." I just couldn't help myself :p Just figured I'd let you know...

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gas sculpture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]