Talk:Rapids

This level-4 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Rivers High‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Limnology and Oceanography Low‑importance

	Oceans portal This article is part of the WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the inland waters and marine environments. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on limnology- or oceanography-related topics, as well as to ensure that limnology and oceanography articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.Limnology and OceanographyWikipedia:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyTemplate:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyLimnology and Oceanography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 15 October 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Rapid. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2021 and 30 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MadiSalinas1. Peer reviewers: Baileypringle8, ReynaDenigan, RaBailBail.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2021 and 11 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ChaseTerry548440. Peer reviewers: Marythemuffinlady, Tommyj0127.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

comments[edit]

I think the grading systems here are both essentially the same as the international grading system (grade I to VI or 1 to 6, also described in Whitewater) which seems to be used almost everywhere now. Do any Australians know any better?

Tebbb 16:47, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

hey whats up I was thinking about adding a note about volume and a quick refernce for conversion between m^3 per second and CFS (cubic feet second)--Stranger 09:28, 2005 Jun 12 (UTC)

Merge[edit]

Wouldn't it make sense to merge this page with Whitewater? This article is hardly a stub, and most of the material that would serve to advance it to a higher level is already present in the other. Robin Z 18:35, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. The difference between the 2 is not enough for separate articles. -- P199 13:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Whitewater is a concept, a rapid or rapids is a geographic feature. Lots of creeks are whitewater, but some rivers have specific rapids, and which are officially named as such. It's like saying a mountain range and a mountain are the same thing and should be merged.Skookum1 (talk) 15:00, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps instead merging this with International Scale of River Difficulty? Tyzoid (talk) 22:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Usage[edit]

Ignorant newby here, ignorant about Wikipedia approaches and also about water terminology. Have a question, though. What about the use of the word "rapids" in place names and geographic terminology, concerning tidal whitewater? Arran Rapids north of Stuart Island in B.C., for instance. Is usage and meaning broader than just for rivers? Is historical meaning as important as that assigned by an organization? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.106.108.36 (talk) 10:28, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are totally right that "rapids" can mean more than what is described in the article. You are welcome to expand on that. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:12, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Rapid" or "Rapids"?[edit]

Why is this article titled "Rapid" and not "Rapids"? Both the OED and the American Heritage Dictionary say "usually plural" for this sense of the word "rapid" and I have never seen it used in the singular. . . Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk to me • contribs) 17:43, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done You're right. The article does have references to "categorization of a rapid", which sounds ok, but what exactly is a rapid? --BDD (talk) 20:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 October 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved, but move Rapid (disambiguation) to Rapid.(closed by non-admin page mover) - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 12:08, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rapids → Rapid – Per WP:SINGULAR. Rafters often talk about hitting a rapid, as in "Class IV rapid". A rapid in this context refers to a contiguous section of rapids, for example "Pierce Ferry Rapid". Jasper Deng (talk) 09:34, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the plural is standard usage—blindlynx 15:01, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Blindlynx: But so is the singular: [1], [2], [3], [4], among numerous others.--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Dictionaries generally specify that the noun is 'usually plural' [5], [6], [7] or list only the plural as a noun [8] [9]. While the noun does not exist only in plural the plural seems to far exceed singular usage—blindlynx 02:10, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    - That's not what WP:SINGULAR says. The only exception I can see is cattle, for lack of a singular form: only a plurale tantum can be a plural article title.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:27, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      - it points to WP:NCPLURAL that has a bit on irregular plurals and a wp:IAR bit, ultimately i fail to see how this change is a benefit—blindlynx 02:37, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
        NCPLURAL doesn't make an exception for this situation either. "Rapids" is not an irregular plural as it is formed from "Rapid" with the appending of an s.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:40, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
        it's irregular in the sense that 'rapids' is exceedingly more common—blindlynx 13:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I see that "rapid" redirects here, but I don't think this article should be the primary redirect for that term. I'd move Rapid (disambiguation) to Rapid. Rreagan007 (talk) 18:34, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Support this, no PRIMARY.--Ortizesp (talk) 23:55, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  support this—blindlynx 13:27, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Singular "rapid" is vague. I agree, maybe we should move Rapid (disambiguation) to Rapid. Steel1943 (talk) 23:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:55, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME, and I agree that we should move move Rapid (disambiguation) to Rapid. Paintspot Infez (talk) 16:06, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.