Talk:The Sensorites

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Sensorites has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starThe Sensorites is part of the Doctor Who (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 17, 2018Good article nomineeListed
December 14, 2018Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 27, 2018.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the designs for the Doctor Who serial The Sensorites were inspired by Antoni Gaudí's design of the Sagrada Família (pictured) in Barcelona, which has no right angles?
Current status: Good article

I am aware that the information about one episode being postponed could have been put elsewhere, but to do this would necessitate a clumsy re-write of the weekly transmission details. The way I have written it still fits into the Doctor Who template well enough.

Masthead image deletion[edit]

Please note that the masthead image here, File:Sensorites.jpg is being discussed for deletion at Wikipedia:Non-free_content_review#File:Sensorites.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 02:37, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Sensorites/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Auldhouse (talk · contribs) 17:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be glad to review this article. Auldhouse (talk) 17:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    Yes. I ran the text through Grammarly and made a few minor copy-edits.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    Yes. And sections also map nicely with other Dr. Who serial entries.
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Pass
    Congratulations! Another GA article for Dr. Who.