User talk:Velvetsmog

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scatman John[edit]

You're a champ for reading the Scatman John page M.C. Brown Shoes 08:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Anything to help.  :) Velvetsmog 16:50, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

John Grisham[edit]

Hey there. In response to your inquiry about John Grisham running, here are a few links. But keep in mind, like Ben Affleck, it is still speculation at this point so there are no official announcements or anything like that yet. link 1, link 2, link 3, link 4. There are also several blogs talking about it, but I won't post those (besides the one).

Thank you for voting![edit]

Hello there! I wanted to thank you for taking the time to vote on my arbitration commitee nomination. Although it was not successful, I appreciate the time you spent to read my statement and questions and for then voting, either positively or negativly. Again, thank you! Páll (Die pienk olifant) 22:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Caffiene[edit]

Erowid is arguably the most notable drug info site on the web; it's the drug equivalent of imdb. I deleted the energyfiend.com link because that site has google syndication which is often an indicator that the anonymous contributor is trying to boost hits to that site via Wikipedia. I agree that the Thinkgeek t-shirt link should be deleted. I focus more on removing spam as it's added, so I didn't notice that. Also, please do not link edit summaries to my talk page (that link has been broken). The comment would've been more appropriate on the Caffiene talk page. OhNoitsJamieTalk 22:33, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I notice you added a bit to the Euchre page about Jack Bauer. Do you have citation for that? Thanks, --William Pietri 05:20, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deval Patrick article[edit]

Hi Velvetsmog. I am curious what you find to be new research in the Landslide section? Thanks. CApitol3 21:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Split electoral vote history[edit]

In the article on Nebraska's 2nd congressional district, you identified the 1892 election as the last time a state split its electoral votes. According to Atlas of American History by Ferrell and Natkiel, West Virginia cast a split electoral vote in 1916. Checking with one of the federal sources cited by Wikipedia articles on U.S. elections, one of West Virginia's votes that year went to Wilson (D), while Hughes (R) got the other seven.

Upon closer examination of the Atlas of American History election maps, it appears there may have been split votes in Tennessee 1948, Mississippi 1956 and Alabama 1960, but I haven't verified those with any other source.

217.209.154.241 (talk) 20:53, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Velvetsmog! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 974 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Norm Rice - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition[edit]

On 31 January 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Pierre Nanterme, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]