Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exodus (organization)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept, article is now completely different from the one that was nominated - SimonP 22:23, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
Exodus (organization)[edit]
Copyvio and advert. See: [1] unsigned by Sethmahoney
What's your vote, Sethmahoney? Fix or delete? —msh210 21:38, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I vote Delete or redirect to Ex-gay, which already has a section on Exodus. -Seth Mahoney 22:24, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: For legal reasons, I'm blanking-copyvioing it. See old version to vote. —msh210 21:38, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- This might be a legitimate (if non-PC) subject for an article - but as it stands I agree it is a copyvio and POV amend or delete --Doc Glasgow 21:37, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I am being bold and redirecting this to Ex-gay, an article which has a good (non-copyvio) section on Exodus, and other similar organizations too. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 23:47, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Split out Section is big enough to have its own article. Klonimus 02:36, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, POV, copyright violation. No redirect - who would type in "Exodus (organization)" in the search engine? Megan1967 04:52, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I agree that this is a good point, but we have a link to Exodus (organization) from Exodus (disambiguation) so someone who types "Exodus" in a search engine and chooses the Wikipedia link will find Ex-gay through a redirect such as the one I created. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 08:09, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio and either split out section from ex-gay or redirect. (Deleting admin should make sure they're deleting the right thing :) ) Mgm|(talk) 08:21, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)
- I performed the split and restored the VfD notice (I'll edit ex-gay to reflect that if this article survives VfD). --Tony Sidaway|Talk 11:16, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.