User talk:GTubio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello GTubio and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Good luck!

Hi, welcome again. Generally, you only sign your comments on pages that are meant for discussion (Wikipedia:Village pump, talk pages, etc.). Articles remain unsigned. Best, [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 21:29, Sep 10, 2004 (UTC)

Hello GTubio this message is a invitation to categorize your userpage in the category: Category:Wikipedians in Spain or in the adecuate sub-category and erasing your name from the equivalent list since the lists of users are in process of being transformed into categories. Remember: You can categorize your user page in more than one category. example: your actual location and your origin country.

for more info see: Wikipedia:User categorisation and Category:Wikipedians by location

Saludos. --Mnts 07:07, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, una pàgina d'usuari divertida. Per què no et registres a la nostrs viqui catalana també? pots ajudar-nos que ens fa falta.

Opció k-95[edit]

I created that article. Do you have a will to help me expanding it? Luka Jačov 22:29, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The thing was that u speak and u could colect more data about them. But I if u dont want ok:) doesnt matter. Do u have icq? Luka Jačov 18:46, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Galicia[edit]

Recently WikiProject Galicia has been created. Perhaps you are interested in joining us to help improving Galicia articles in English Wikipedia. --Stoni(talk) 14:18, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

removing links to NYT[edit]

Hi GTubio -- we generally do not delete links to NYT articles, even though they now only provide an abstract and not full text unless you have a subscription. If you can find a free version of the same text, feel free to link it instead, but there is no absolute prohibition against it, and we do it all the time for articles in, e.g., scientific journals that are pay-for-access. Sdedeo (tips) 14:27, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shereshevskii[edit]

I have created redirect Shereshevskii. I think it is what you want abakharev 23:00, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Just wait a day or two until they reindex the search database. If it would not appear in a couple of days, then it is a bug in Wikimedia software, that probably should be reported abakharev 23:12, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Un saludo[edit]

Gracias por tu comentario en mi página de discusión, siento no haber dicho nada antes pero he estado desconectado del mundo :P. Sin tu corrección no habría caído en la falta tonta que había cometido (tonta porque se ya sabia que era una falta y aún así la cometo). El Star Control en realidad lo tengo en la lista de Cosas a Investigar (desde hace bastante, nunca encuentro el momento) :) Un saludo. Outlyer 01:55, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese COlonial War[edit]

Thanks for your work about the Portuguese Colonial War, I proposed it to peer review in Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review. Check it and say something if you want. Thanks. Afonso Silva 00:04, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

COTW Project[edit]

You voted for Lipovans, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. -Scottwiki 04:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Delete Definitely not-notable[edit]

Hello! I hope you are feeling fine. As for the comments which I made, I wish to make some things clear. Currently, I agree that I may be contradicting myself in this. But when I vote delete because the article is non-notable, it does not mean that the article will not be in Wikipedia forever. I also hope to see the day when Wikipedia has ALL possible human knowledge but we should do this step by step. In fact, the popular opinion of most users is to exclude articles which seem non-notable in Wikipedia. However, I personally hope that this would change in the future. But right now, if the article is kept in Wikipedia, it is perfectly fine with me. But as I have said before, my hands are tied in this matter. That particular article would most likely be deleted but if it appears again and users change their stance on this, I am more than glad to comply. Lastly, I wish to state that based on my past experience in AfD votes which I had voted Keep, I had to endure strong negative comments by users who voted Delete. But my philosophy on this matter remains unchanged deep within my heart. It is my desire to see ALL human knowledge on Wikipedia. --Siva1979Talk to me 21:00, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you very much[edit]

for voting "Strong keep" for article I wrote about that song.Dzoni 01:59, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article is being voted again [1] Dzoni 23:17, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have just created an atheist wikiproject! It is still in its infancy, and will need some love before it starts to take shape. Please help in any way you can. Thanks, Hezzy 03:45, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1930's stats[edit]

Hi:) The rest of the list (starting in eleventh place) is:- [own edit, I complete the list with the first ten]

  • USA 113 gold pounds (LOL),
  • Canada £91
  • New Zealand £74
  • Australia £72
  • Argentina £66
  • UK £56
  • Netherlands £56
  • Switzerland £53
  • Norway £48
  • Sweden £40
  • Germany 39
  • Denmark 38
  • USSR 36
  • Belgium 30
  • Austria 24
  • Czechoslaovakia 23
  • Ireland 22
  • Italy 21
  • Portugal 18
  • Finland 16
  • Hungary 15
  • Egypt 15
  • South Africa 14
  • Estonia 14
  • Latvia 14
  • Spain 13
  • Japan 13
  • Greece 12
  • Yugoslavia 12
  • Poland 11
  • Lithuania 11

Figures compiled from official sources of each nation (generally 1935). Source: The Atlas of Today and Tomorrow by Alexander Rado published by Victor Gollancz (London 1938).

I have seen other historical figures in the library but I cant remeber the title of the book unfortunately. But the figures are controversial. In particular the above list is not on a "Purchasing power parity" basis. It may be that some currencies (such as the dollar and the rouble) were overvalued. Jameswilson 00:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tyrael[edit]

I have nominated Tyrael, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyrael. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 21:12, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:CroatiaLastovo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]