User talk:AAAAA

Archive 1 (Sep 25, 2004 - October 31st, 2005) - My First Archive

Archive 2 (Nov 1, 2005 - Dec 20, 2020)

January 2023[edit]

An article you recently created, Draft:GPT-4, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks. Silikonz💬 02:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You basically erased my work from history. There's no more Draft:GPT-4. Couldn't you just have added or modified information, added references etc? I created it as a stub so it could develop, as all Wikipedia articles do. I used to put a lot of time since 2004 for a few years, but then Wikipedia got invaded by people like you that want to control everything and don't accept anything that is outside your establish boundaries. People like you make me hate doing any editing in Wikipedia. AAAAA (talk) 05:17, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question about GPT-4[edit]

Hello. I'm just curious if your article Draft:Draft:GPT-4 was generate by an AI? Thanks a lot. Looking forward to your feedback. –Novem Linguae (talk) 06:55, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The initial stub, YES. I created it using AI. Then I added some information I found in an article. But then a couple Wikipedia editors deleted all my work and now it doesn't exist at all. BAD PEOPLE! AAAAA (talk) 05:18, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you verify that the AI-generated statements were correct? — rsjaffe 🗣️ 05:48, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and I did make some modifications to the initial stub. AAAAA (talk) 14:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Draft:GPT-4[edit]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Draft:GPT-4 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

There is a human-written page at Draft:GPT-4. This page has no value and is made-up, as GPT-4 isn't released yet.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:30, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"This page has no value and is made-up, as GPT-4 isn't released yet."

So... it's OK to delete the page I made but not OK to delete the current GPT-4 page that was made by someone else? AAAAA (talk) 14:35, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FlashForge moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, FlashForge, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ost (talk) 15:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FlashForge (June 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FlashForge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AAAAA! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of GPT-5[edit]

The article GPT-5 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Speculative article, per WP:CRYSTAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WindTempos ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have started an AfD process for this, as mentioned below. StereoFolic (talk) 10:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GPT-5 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GPT-5 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GPT-5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

StereoFolic (talk) 10:21, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: GPT-5 (September 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

Editor, this is WP:TOOSOON to be submitted. The article mainly consists of pure speculation from tech websites, which isn't really the basis for an article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GPT-5 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 18:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:FlashForge[edit]

Hello, AAAAA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:FlashForge, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:FlashForge[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:FlashForge has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:46, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]