Talk:Animanga

VfD of 3 Nov 2004

Animanga was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made below the archived discussion rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP

A dicdef for a neologism. Cool! (I'm willing to accept that perhaps this just needs cleanup, but to me it seems a rather low-grade neologism created by squishing two words together.) Ashibaka ✎ 19:55, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Keep, I see no reason to delete, considerable amount of google hits also. [[User:Xezbeth|Xezbeth ─┼─]] 20:28, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. It's just a word blend. --Improv 20:52, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• I don't know what to do with this article, but I noticed it earlier, and it can't stay as-is, as it's talking about two different and distict although similar topics. Maybe make it a disambig for anime and manga? I can't say I'd be sorry to see it go, however. - RedWordSmith 20:58, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• This should probably exist as a sort of disambiguation page for anime and manga. It is a term that people use. [[User:Aranel|Aranel ("Sarah")]] 00:17, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Keep as a disambig type page. —siroχo 02:47, Nov 4, 2004 (UTC)

• A neologism with over 100,000 google pages and over 10,000 google articles, many dating back a decade? KEEP 132.205.45.148 15:02, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Anonymous users can't vote duder Ashibaka ✎ 05:05, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
    • Wikipedia:Deletion_guidelines_for_administratorsFor example, administrators can disregard votes and comments if they feel that there is strong evidence that they were not made in good faith Any anon can vote. If administrators choose to ignore anon votes, they should atleast think about it, because Administrators necessarily must use their best judgement, attempting to be as impartial as is possible otherwise they are not being impartial. 132.205.45.148 16:09, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Keep I've been seeing this in Previews too long for it to be a neologism... --Asmodai 04:21, Nov 6, 2004 (UTC)

End archived discussion -- Graham ☺ | Talk 19:11, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)