Talk:Dodge Coronet

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Coronet and Satellite[edit]

I have a real problem calling the 1971 Coronet and Satellite twins. The two cars look nothing like each other. The "Mom & Pop" style of the '71 Coronet doesn't compare to the streamlined "shark-shape" of the '71 satellite. Am I missing something? Rsduhamel 19:53, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

It's probably because they're both b-bodies. (I didnt' write that though.) Davert 16:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Belvedere redirect?[edit]

Erm, why does Plymouth Belvedere-> redirect to Dodge Coronet? -- Phyzome is Tim McCormack 14:37, 2005 May 3 (UTC)

Someone fixed that Davert 14:52, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1958 dodge coronet texan[edit]

anyone heard of a coronet texan,if so can you give me any history thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.104.42.93 (talk) 13:01, 8 June 2006

See http://www.allpar.com/old/texan.html Davert 16:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second Generation?[edit]

The way this article was before, it seemed to imply that 1955-57 was one generation and 1958-59 was another. The info on Allpar shows changes in 1957, but I don't know if that's a new generation or not. Recent edits to this article make it seem like 1955-59 was a single generation. What is it? --Sable232 22:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coronet Super Bee?[edit]

That part was hard. I kept getting glitches. After a while, I got it right. Why would they think of a Coronet Super Bee? Why couldn't they just give the title to the Dodge Charger. That's what I want.

There is no seventh generation[edit]

Seventh generation? What seventh generation? A restyle of the grille and headlights does not constitute a new generation when the rest of the car is essentially the same. 1971-1976 should be a single generation, not split into two. Mechanically they are the same and most of the sheet metal is carried over from 1974. It is not a new car justifying being placed in a new generation.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dodge Coronet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121026074531/http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/files/1959_0603_dodge.jpg to http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/files/1959_0603_dodge.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]