Talk:Super Bowl XXXVIII

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Houston, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HoustonWikipedia:WikiProject HoustonTemplate:WikiProject HoustonHouston articles

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

National Football League: Patriots High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Patriots task force.

Comment by Skybunny[edit]

I didn't actually check all of the scores on this page (I only added the Colts-Patriots and noticed that the Packers-Eagles game was misordered so changed that one as well) -- according to the following:

By custom, the home team in any sporting event is always listed last, football included. Doing so implicitly shows where the game was played; the score makes the winner obvious and makes it unnecessary to list the winner first.

Skybunny 23:51, 18 Jan 2004 (UTC)

OK, I'll fix it or someone else can. Sorry about that. Anthony DiPierro 02:15, 19 Jan 2004 (UTC)

inappropriate comment[edit]

What's this about Tom Brady being a cracker who deserves death? OK, it appears to have been changed.

The external BBC link at the bottom of the page does not give extra information; it presents a viewpoint. Is this appropriate?

Should this article include information on what CBS aired after the Superbowl? Survivor All-Star

The Streaker[edit]

I notice there is no mention of the streaker —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.6.163.253 (talk • contribs) .

It was moved to the Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show controversy article. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 19:07, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the entry for Super Bowl 36 it is mentioned that the Patriots elected to be introduced as a team. Then it is mentioned that except for SB 37 every SB team has been introduced in this fashion. But this article claimed For the second year in a row the teams were introduced as a whole. So I changed the first sentence under Pre-Game ceremonies Jaylectricity 01:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most Roman numerals[edit]

Would this be the Super Bowl to date to have the most Roman numerals until Super Bowl LXXXVIII in 2054? Night Tracks (talk) 09:41, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Super Bowl XXXVIII. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101223233356/http://ag.nfl.com/ to http://ag.nfl.com/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.sportsnetwork.com/default.asp?c=sportsnetwork&page=nfl%2Fsuperbowl%2F2005%2Fsuperbowl-alltime-odds.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051202063839/http://www.sportingnews.com/archives/superbowl/ to http://www.sportingnews.com/archives/superbowl/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:57, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]