User talk:Kensai

Hi Kensai, and welcome to Wikipedia.

Thankyou for finding the time to sign up and contribute to our little project. If you're in doubt about anything, you might want to check out some of these pages:

• Welcome, newcomers - a general introduction, and a good starting point
• The help centre and FAQs
• The Manual of Style - a guide to the community's writing conventions

It's also a good idea to sign the new user log and add a little about yourself.

When contributing to a talk page, you can sign your name by typing four tildes after your comments, like this: ~~~~. (Just so you know, some people won't pay attention to unsigned comments).

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me at my talk page, or at the Help desk or Village Pump.

Above all, make sure you be bold when contributing, and have fun!

-- TPK 09:00, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome! Actually I've been contributing for a long time now (2-3 years) but didn't care to have an account. I want to become more active now. --Kensai 09:08, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)

EU Turkey flag

Hi. You uploaded Image:EU Turkey emblem.gif but I haven't been able to find where you got this from. Could you please provide a source for it? Thanks. --G Rutter 14:09, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Ehm, actually I made it myself. I thought it might be interesting to design the European emblem with red color, a crescent, and the initials "EÜ" in Turkish (which mean EU of course). I thought it blended very well to the third section of the article, which was dealing with the debate on the matter. Will you consider changing it back to the previous? --Kensai 15:40, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Thanks! I also tend to respond on both talk pages, as it's quicker and people can keep track of what's going on. I'm afraid that this probably comes under Wikipedia:No original research. The reason I found out that this image existed was becuase it was on the Main Page, presumably because someone thought it was an official emblem. I can understand what you mean on the page, but again, people might well think that it's the official or proposed flag. I'm afraid that we're really meant to report what's already out there, rather than create something that illustrates our point (no matter how well it does it). Therefore, I think that the image really should be deleted. I'm sorry about this, as it must have taken you a while, but it's just one of those things I'm afraid... --G Rutter 16:05, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Understood! Since this is a real article about real events/issues I agree. I never thought of the implications that my action might have had, especially the 'proposed flag' misunderstanding which could have been serious. Perhaps in a future trivial article debating about flag and vexillology matters this image finds its way. Thanks for clearing this up! --Kensai 17:08, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

No problem - thank you! Keep up the good work! --G Rutter 17:19, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Pavlos, Crown Prince of Greece, Plebiscite Year

Thanks for your interest in this article and for checking over the info presented! Regarding the plebiscite year; my understanding is that there was one in July 1973 held by the Colonels' junta, and then another in Dec 1974 held by Karamanlis' government. Both were on the question of abolishing the monarchy in favor of a republic. Both are referred to in the Pavlos, Crown Prince of Greece article, although for Dec 1974, the word referendum is used instead of plebiscite. (This is why I find it confusing to set a date for exactly when the monarchy was abolished and the republic began - 1973 or 1974?). So, I'd like to change the initial plebiscite date in the Pavlos article back to 1973 - but thought I'd run it by you first. Thanks, and glad someone has been looking over the recent additions to the article! LiniShu 19:28, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Neuroarthistory

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Neuroarthistory, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Bjones 13:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Concorde

If it helps, text is here jimfbleak 19:04, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Logo sup.gif

Thank you for uploading Image:Logo sup.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Jython.png

Thanks for uploading File:Jython.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

OpenViBE

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of OpenViBE, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.irisa.fr/bunraku/OpenViBE/openvibe-x.x.x-documentation/index.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:55, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Deleted article

I will restore it for you to work on. Deb (talk) 12:22, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kensai. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kensai. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kensai. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Mikhail Lebedev

We urgently need a Wikipedia article on the famous neuorscientist, Mikhail Lebedev. Can you please finish the article on Mikhail Lebedev this weekend? It needs to be nominated as a good or featured article within 30 days. I Already started. Please see Draft:Mikhail Lebedev (neuorscientist). — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek (talk • contribs) 01:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)