Talk:Roche de la Muzelle

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mountains: Alps Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Alps task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled[edit]

So little information in the table, it would be better to move it into the main text.

Also better to remove "stunningly beautiful"

(William M. Connolley 22:46, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)) Well maybe. But it is. And the page isn't exactly over-full of other text yet. As for the table: I copied it from the wikiprojects mountain template, so its probably best left in. It will get filled in.

it's not about whether the page is full of text or not. check the styleguide. it's a POV. --Tomheaton 08:32, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)

(William M. Connolley 09:28, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)) Nara Prefecture Altai Alcoy Walther von der Vogelweide ...etc etc...

agreed on the table staying in then.--Tomheaton 09:47, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)

(William M. Connolley 15:49, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)) Karachi Cistercians Titian Mashhad Hanover

I think you care about this much more than me, so I'll leave it.--Tomheaton 16:13, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)

(William M. Connolley 17:44, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)) OK, thanks.