Talk:Fifth generation of video game consoles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:History of video game consoles (third generation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Fifth generation of video game consoles's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Kent_493_496":

  • From Sega Genesis: Kent, Steven L. (2001). "The "Next" Generation (Part 1)". The Ultimate History of Video Games: The Story Behind the Craze that Touched our Lives and Changed the World. Prima Publishing. ISBN 0-7615-3643-4.
  • From List of commercial failures in video gaming: Kent, Steven L. (2001). "The "Next" Generation (Part 1)". The Ultimate History of Video Games: The Story Behind the Craze that Touched our Lives and Changed the World. Roseville, California: Prima Publishing. ISBN 0-7615-3643-4.
  • From List of Sega 32X games: Kent, Steven L. (2001). The Ultimate History of Video Games: The Story Behind the Craze that Touched our Lives and Changed the World. Roseville, California: Prima Publishing. pp. 493–496. ISBN 0-7615-3643-4.

Reference named "Allgame32X":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 23:28, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fifth generation of video game consoles. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't we use a picture of the PlayStation with its original controller?[edit]

Other articles in this series show systems that have multiple major revisions with the original forms of their controllers and then later forms. The first and second Genesis and SG-1000 vs Mark III/Master System for example. On this article though we only see the PlayStation with the DualShock controller, not the original D-Pad only version. The DualShock didn't come out until 3 years after the system launched. Wouldn't it be a good idea to replace the first image of the PlayStation from the Home systems area with one with the original controller? Lando242 (talk) 03:21, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds reasonable to me. I say go for it.--Martin IIIa (talk) 21:04, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fifth generation of video game consoles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? Handheld?[edit]

Virtual Boy is home console because on a game told is an home console. Why do you people think Virtual Boy is handheld?--64.237.158.48 (talk) 19:57, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Fifth generation of video game consoles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:23, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Every Colors entry in the Video table is totally wrong[edit]

The author actually multiplies the resolution to get the number of pixels and calls that number of colors, from a palette that is always 24bit. That's a totally wrong way to describe number of colors (one has to find the info or know the system). I might spend some time to correct some of this later, unless someone does it first. I don't know about most systems but for example I am pretty sure about the 3DO as I develop for it. I do know that the framebuffer is 15bit (32768 colors), although there is a process in the DAC that will scale up and interpolate 240p to 480p where full 24bit is used. But the actual videoram is 15bit without a palette (although some texture formats can be paletized indexed from the same 15bit depth). I am not sure yet how to correct the other entries as I am not familiar with the other consoles (however, a look at the individual wiki entries on each console or some FAQ might help) but I know they are all totally wrong and based on the same wrong assumption.

why I think should 3DO should be in other consoles[edit]

from what I can tell, 3DO isn't really 3D, it sorta blurred the difference between movies and games, instead of displaying 3D, it displays FMV (full motion video) although CD Rom add ons and Philips CDI basically do the same thing, It even went out of its way to insult Super Nintendo and Sega Genesis calling them "Baby Toys" even though most people owned them and not many people owned a 3DO so it came and went and now is just a curious piece of history. 3Do was pretty rare and didn't sell very well — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rowbro (talkcontribs) 21:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Rowbro: None of this changes which generation is occurred in or what reliable sourcing says. Do you have any sourcing that states it belongs to some other generation? If you make this disruptive edit again, you will likely be blocked. You've already been given final warnings for these disruptive unsourced edits. -- ferret (talk) 22:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

here's a source, watch the benining of this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyaF_gCKWsI&t=209s — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.93.54.201 (talk) 23:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a reliable source. Please read WP:V and WP:RS as you've been directed to before. -- ferret (talk) 00:02, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying 3DO should be in fourth generation, I'm just saying that I think it should be in other consoles--Rowbro (talk) 21:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And yet, reliable sources don't agree with that view, such as https://www.bbc.co.uk/archive/console_generations/zvcjkty -- ferret (talk) 23:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Atari jaguar needs to be added[edit]

Atari jaguar should be added as it was the last atari console and was one of the first 5th generation consoles. 184.166.13.170 (talk) 19:46, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's already in the article. -- ferret (talk) 19:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Design Master Senshi Mangajukuu Image[edit]

File:Design Master Denshi Mangajuku product packaging.jpg I don't know why this isn't in the "Other handhelds" section DoDoDon (talk) 15:19, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns on Add-ons Comparison Table[edit]

I like the idea of it, but both the Jaguar CD and the Nintendo 64 DD are essentially media readers and nothing more. There are a lot of holes in the table because of this. Before this I had included the 32x in the main hardware comparison table, and while I was pleased with it I understand if some think it didn't belong. In my opinion treating the 32x as the proto-saturn it is makes the main comparison table much more interesting. PiersyPiersy (talk) 18:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]