Talk:Aircraft attitude

Even aside from the introductory joke, this is barely a dictionary entry. Expandable, or should it be deleted?Vicki Rosenzweig 02:46, 30 Oct 2003 (UTC)

seems to have been expanded :) but that aside: I think "Unusual attitudes" is kind of an euphemism? I mean technically it's correct, but unusual is not the best word to headline that paragraph, unfortunately I can't think of a better word right now.

avoided? feared? (too emotional) Deelkar 17:24, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)

The link to orientation is unfortunate, as none of the available definitions of orientation in WikiPedia is the one intended by the article.

Attitude clothing[edit]

What about the clothing company (www.attitude.uk.com)?

Merge with yaw, pitch and roll[edit]

Anybody else thinks that both articles should be merged? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.170.46.90 (talk) 13:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hangon![edit]

Grr! Just discovered that the article I was going to move here is a direct copy of Aircraft_principal_axes with a badly written lead section replacing the original.

This (Aircraft attitude) should actually be changed to a redirect to the Aircraft_principal_axes article.

Sorry about that! --Haruth (talk) 13:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to redirect to the more appropriate location Aircraft principal axes. --Haruth (talk) 00:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]