User talk:President George W. Bush

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --fvw* 14:36, 2005 Jan 6 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --fvw* 15:08, 2005 Jan 6 (UTC)

Please be aware of and adhere to Wikipedia:Three revert rule. Gamaliel 16:18, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Although CBC is a valid news source (and I am Canadian), the link that you provided does not contain any actual content. It only describes a televised biography on Dick Cheney. If you want your edit to be accepted, you should provide a link that contains valid, neutral content about Dick Cheney (similar to the Wikipedia article). -- Deathphoenix 16:45, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

3RR violation[edit]

Hi, you have been temporarily blocked from editing for violating the Wikipedia:Three revert rule at Dick Cheney, specifically:

  • 14:53, 6 Jan 2005 President George W. Bush - add content
  • 15:20, 6 Jan 2005 President George W. Bush - first revert
  • 15:28, 6 Jan 2005 President George W. Bush - second revert
  • 15:33, 6 Jan 2005 President George W. Bush - third revert
  • 15:40, 6 Jan 2005 President George W. Bush - fourth revert (limit exceeded)

This block is a short on, in an attempt to impress on you that we are serious about these rules, and have enforcement mechanisms.

In future, please follow all Wikipedia policies, and please also note that the community consensus (see WP:AN#Three revert rule) is that a reversion with an edit added into it (e.g. adding some categories, or linking dates) is still a reversion, and still counts against the 3RR.

Also, please respect community consensus; whatever the decision is, you really have to go along with it. Refusing to follow a community decision, and making edits in the face of it, is a serious infraction, which can garner you a much longer block. Repeated failure to do so has led to people being banned. I know it can be a problem sometimed - numbers do not make for correctness. Nonetheless, like Churchill's saying about democracy, it's the best rule we can work out, and to discard it would lead only to chaos. Good wishes for your future edits. Noel (talk) 18:34, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

User name[edit]

Dear Mr President

I am thrilled that you are able to be with us and admire the self-deprecation of your User page. Congratulations on your magnificent election result and good luck for the next four years.

If, Sir, however you are not the President, I respectfully request that you read this name policy document which prohibits the use of names in certain circumstances. I will be requesting action on this and hope you could pre-empt it by changing your name straight away.

Libertas Fair & Balanced

[1]

Wikipedia:Username[edit]

Please look at Wikipedia:Username and request a change of your username. Fred Bauder 17:54, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)

For your information, there is a long discussion about proper procedure in matters of this kind at Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Request_for_User_Name_Review with links to various policy pages. Fred Bauder 12:29, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)