Talk:Hydrogen sulfide

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nkopplin.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Health Benefits[edit]

University of Exeter says small doses of Hydrogen Sulfide are beneficial. Could someone check and type that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.8.24.2 (talk) 17:12, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dissociation constant controversy[edit]

I am a bit confussed regarding the second dissociation constant.

The second dissociation constant of hydrogen sulfide is often stated to be around 10−13, but it is now clear that this is an error caused by oxidation of the sulfur in alkaline solution. The current best estimate for pKa2 is 19±2.[2]

Is it so clear?

A search in the internet on these values often gives 10-13. For example: In the journal of the electorchemical society "Electrochemical identification of the hydrogen sulphide system..." J. Electrochem. Soc ., Volume 145, Issue 1 pp77-79 (Jan 1998) gives the value as 13.86. The abstract states "The controversy on the dissociation constant is discussed". This reference post dates the Wikipedia reference (2). I thought controversy should be avoided in Wikipedia. At least a few words on this "controversy" would help the non expert like myself to understand which figure might be correct.

--SlipTimeKnot 09:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

possible error?[edit]

The artical says that "carbon disulfide burns to sulfur dioxide, which can be smelled when mathes are ignighted" Considering that CS2 is a gas, it seems highly unlikely that matches contain it. Anybody know for sure.

(You mean H2S rather than CS2.) I think you have a point: the sentence is misleading. While it is true that H2S burns to SO2, and it is true that SO2 can be smelled when lighting a match, the juxtaposition implies that lighting a match burns H2S, which is not true. AxelBoldt 00:14, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Olfactory nerve paralysis[edit]

The article states that, after an initial strong exposure, the olfactory nerve is paralysed, preventing a person to perceive the smell of hydrogen sulfide. Does anyone know if this is a temporary paralysis, or a reversible one?

For moderate exposures, I'm pretty sure that it's more-or-less reversable, but a few years ago I was reading some work on rat experiments where the doses were well into the "olfactory paralysis" ranges for humans ; for some of the unfortunate rats their response included sloughing the linings of their nasal passages. With damage like that, permanent loss of sense of smell is plausible. Killing of the nasal nerves is also possible, even if the olfactory organs remain in place and alive.

I haven't heard the question addressed in the many industrial H2S-safety courses I've had to sit through (at least 10, possibly 15 or more). The theory being that if you ever get exposed to that level of H2S, then you're in a personal survival mode, you and several other people have fucked up quite severely, and there have been major equipment failures too. By which point, you're in serious fear of getting dead, and losing your sense of smell isn't very high on your list of priorities. (I've been threatened with being run-off jobs for reporting H2S levels of a few PPM, barely 0.02 of the levels needed to induce olfactory paralysis ; that's me doing my job responsibly and a supervisor being dangerous.)

A Karley 22:24, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Americanisation[edit]

I know this is going to be unpopular (Wikipedia being an American based website) but the American spelling of the article is chemically incorrect unless you can proove otherwise (knowledge as a chemistry student admittedly in a British Sixth Form, and my sources are the textbooks I use), please move this to Hydrogen Sulphide as I don't seem to be able to. Argue about it if you want, but I'm sticking by my guns sorry! and Im not particularly anti-American if you are wondering, Im a A-Level student! lol Medscin 19:12, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

      • Totally agree with your sentiments, Djm1279. In fact, even "Americanisation" is not accurate, because the standard spelling in Canada is "sulphide" (and "sulphur"), so this is purely a USA "thang". The accepted spelling in all Commonwealth countries, including Canada (along with India, Australasia, South Africa and others), is with -ph-. (That's notwithstanding the invocation of IUPAC and RSC in the comments below). That's also the case with the EC/EP English recommendations for usage in Europe. Looks like not eceryone is happy to roll over when it comes to this particular manifestation of cultural imperialism. [User:Dabs} 11:45 20 December 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.131.212.68 (talk) 11:28, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Both IUPAC and the Royal Society of Chemistry have adopted the spelling of sulfur with an 'f'. But take heart, we use aluminium instead of the Americanized version, aluminum. See Sulfur#Spelling. Edgar181 20:09, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fair dos as we at my college say, and ta for the spelling alteration, sorry! it's not a word I commonly use (i.e. Americanization), however how come my textbooks, the exam board, and my teacher spell it as sulphur like that if the RSc spell it as Sulfur?. Medscin 21:11, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Old habits don't change easily, I guess. Americans still use British units instead of metric. Edgar181 21:39, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify - IUPAC, RSC and multiple others have ACCEPTED that there are two alternative spellings for sulPHur, sulFur, aluminIUM and aluminUM, and said that they're effectively not interested in getting into a pissing contest about it. As long as there's no ambiguity, there's not an issue to interest anyone other than linguistic and orthographic historians. And spelling Nazis. Godwin's Law Whether the F or the PH spelling is more common is probably dependent on whether the majority of major chemistry journals are edited in America or in the Rest of The World. A Karley 22:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would imagine it was named Sulphur when first discovered. An American's idea of a consensus is to impose their spellings on things that pre-date their oh so young and ever so slightly borrowed language.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.31.42.97 (talk • contribs)

Chemistry has decided to follow IUPAC rules, where sulfur is spelled with an f .. that is what we adhere to. Endless reversions will not change the spelling that you want to use. --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:40, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take the liberty of moving the information that there is two alternative spellings of this compound to the end of the intro paragaph, to make the more relevant information come before the fallout of the "pissing contest".Michi zh (talk) 08:10, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Solubility[edit]

I've reverted an anon's edit to the solubility value. It may have been correct, but there was accompanying deletion which looked as if it may have been inadvertent. Can anyone confirm the value? Noisy | Talk 15:27, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did a quick lookup of the solubility in the 91st Edition, 2010-2011, of the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics in Section 8, in the table titled "Solubility of Selected Gases in Water" and found it to be about half the value reported here, giving 0.2075g H2S / 100g water at 20 C. The table did not extend to 40 C. I would suggest we carefully consider what definition of "solubility" we are using, then rely on a commonly accepted source for data with a citation. --160.94.47.16 (talk) 21:21, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bond angle[edit]

H20 has a near-tetrahedral bond angle because of molecular orbital hybridization. I seem to remember that H2S and H2Se have different chemistries because they don't hybridize, so the bond angle is nearly 90 degrees one would expect from an s-s bond and a s-p bond. I'm not near a chemistry library now. Anyone know for sure?

I'm nowhere near a chemistry library either, but from memory the bond angle is about 95°. This can be explained either by hybridisation or by VSEPR theory. Physchim62 (talk) 14:00, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further nomenclature[edit]

I would suggest the term sour gas be added as a further name for hydrogen sulphide. this term is more generally used in the oil and gas industry.

The only time I hear "sour gas" used in the oil industry (where I've worked for the last 20 years) has been in H2S safety courses in phrases like "you may also hear sour gas being used as a synonym for H2S" ; at least in the circles I work in, most people are degree-educated and professional with it apart form some of the roughnecks, who don't need to be told what may have been common practice when drilling with wooden derricks and steam engines onshore in America two generations ago. The term is of historical interest only. Which is valid, in a historical context. A Karley 22:43, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Accretion of dangers warnings[edit]

The article about an important chemical compound is slowly acreting a lot of stuff about its hazards. much of it anecdotal. As was done on aniline and hydrazine, much of this material is likely to be compactable into one or two sentences. One can consult an MSDS to get better information.--Smokefoot 20:38, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I cut it down drastically. This should be enough. --Dirk Beetstra T C 20:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I can appreciate the need to prevent articles spiralling out of control, but you may also wish to be careful of continually relying on MSDS as references, as I tend to find them often lacking in detail with regards to how to identify and deal with hazards. Commonly massively compacted themselves, and advising with only basic information - e.g. "wear a respirator" and nothing about neutralisation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.156.92.39 (talk) 03:28, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it's OK to relate why Princeton University (probably still) uses a water solution of thioacetamide for such purposes as qualitative chemistry, to see metal sulfide colors. In the late 1940 or early 1950s, a student, probably working alone, and maybe after hours, was using a pressurized bottle of H2S gas in a lab. Being unfamiliar with the functions of the various parts of the filling and release parts of the cylinder, he took a wrench and loosened a fitting which should not ever have been loosened unless the cylinder was empty. Escaping gas prevented him from reassembling the fitting, although he apparently tried to do so. He died. Nikevich (talk) 01:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How many people have ever smelled rotten eggs??[edit]

I am always amused by statements such as in the "Toxicity section" of this article, namely: "0.0047 ppm is the recognition threshold, the concentration at which 50% of humans can detect the characteristic rotten egg odor of hydrogen sulfide". I would guess that less than 1 person in 10,000 of us has ever smelled a rotten egg ... so how can that be the characteristic odor? It would be much more useful to describe the odor as that of flatulence (in other words, a fart) because almost all of us have been subjected to that odor at one time or another. Before you remind me, I know that the rotten egg terminology is in all the textbooks and encyclopedias ... but, I repeat, that perhaps less than 1 person in 10,000 has ever smelled a rotten egg. - mbeychok 05:49, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This has always amused me too. The problem with the "flatulence" comparison is that flatulence is also highly variable. Personally, if someone wants to know what H2S smells like, I tell them to come and give me a hand checking/ calibrating the H2S detectors in our gas package, and give them a sniff of the 5ppm calibration gas mix. The benefits in education outweigh the (minuscule) risk of the procedure. A Karley 22:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The "Rotten Egg" smell is used commonly in stink bombs and other gag paraphenalia, I believe algae smells like this as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.175.17.2 (talk) 16:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I smelled a rotten egg once. We should create a userbox for that! ("This user has smelled a rotten egg"; Category:Wikipedians who have smelled rotten eggs) --Itub 18:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have smelt rotten egg several times. You should have seen my friend's kitchen... or perhaps not. --smidoid —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smidoid (talk • contribs) 17:25, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have smelt rotten egg. It doesn't have to be actually turning to mush, if you leave a boiled and peeled egg sitting around for long enough, the inside will start getting a bluey green tinge to it, which is the iron in it changing colour as H2S is evolved. I expect a more universal description, which is constant where ever you are, is that of stagnant water; usually when scooping up or disturbing the mud in the bottom of a swamp or drain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.156.92.39 (talk) 03:33, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vapour Density[edit]

The mention regarding the gas vapour density effect on its behaviour is correct if it relates to pure H2S which is not very common. At the low concentrations normally associated with this gas the characteristics of the carrying fluid (liquid or gas) have the greater influence.

10,000ppm = 1% i.e. 99% of something else.

It is found in low lying areas when it is associated with a liquid. The main influences in the hydrocarbon industry on the gas behaviour is the velocity of any pressurised leak of the carrying gas (e.g. methane) and wind speed and direction. A pressurised leak also causes turbulence resulting in a mixing of the gas with the atmosphere producing further dilution often resulting in a gas air mixture with a vapour density close to that of air.

However it is still possible to see procedures advising people to gain height during an H2S emergency which would be tragic if they were above a leak with an upward velocity or they ran down-wind towards higher ground.

Bob - January 2007 bob@optimaepc.fsnet.co.uk (By the way I'm English but have no problem with American spellings) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 90.240.197.87 (talk) 13:40, 22 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I see your concerns. First I want to stress, safety sections should be kept to a minimum (per WP:NOT, not a manual/not a safety guard). But well, that does not mean that what is written there should not be correct. Could you give it a try to rewrite the section, I think it should be kept to 3-4 sentences, stating the typical dangers, for the rest people will have to find a MSDS (direct external links are better avoided for bias-reasons)? Cheers! --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:35, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Being heavier than air, it tends to accumulate at the bottom of poorly ventilated spaces". I think this is a later addition and appears to have reversed the results of the dicussion above. I would suggest that the author reads the Wikipedia articles relevant to diffusion. If, for example, an air/hydrogen sulfide mixture was contained in a poorly ventilated space the molecules of H2S would be evenly distributed thorughout the mixture, the idea that these molecules would descend past the molecules of nitrogen and oxygen due to the effects of gravity is ridiculous. The density of oxygen is 1.41 that of of nitrogen. Therefore, given sufficient time, would the author expect the oxygen concentration "at the bottom of poorly ventilated space" to increase? Another interesting Wikipedia article explains cognitive bias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.132.14.85 (talk) 05:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HTML code?[edit]

Anyone want to fix the mess that is this page? I would myself but am still just getting used to wiki's particular ways of interpreting code.

It seems that in recent decades, non-subscripted numerals in chemical formulae have become acceptable. It's a real pity, especially in Wikipedia, because it's so easy to insert a <sub></sub> pair here. (Please scroll down to the heading "Chemistry needs correct formatting".) I regard it as being sub-literate as, say, arbitrary capitalization within a word. I suspect one reason it's commonplace is that so few people study chemistry in high school. 98.118.125.197 (talk) 00:55, 22 June 2011 (UTC) (Sorry; that was my post; I'm terrible about logging on... I have DHCP, and I do change it now and then.Nikevich (talk) 01:01, 22 June 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Need to update the odor threshold in the Tox section[edit]

Based on the information available on the odor threshold for H2S, I don't think that the odor recognition value listed in this entry is a value that is rigorously supported in the literature. It also fails to convey the significant variability of H2S odor thresholds. The reference cited in this entry is based on a table from a 1978 document from the Water Environment Federation, and as far as I can tell it is the only reference that gives a recognition threshold of 0.00047 ppm for H2S. Also, this specific 1978 document is not readily available, so it is difficult to track down the study or studies on which this value was based.

In 2006, the CDC's Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry published a toxicological profile for H2S that provides an updated and more realistic statement on the variability of the odor threshold of H2S as it is represented in the literature (http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp114.html). On page 129 of 253 of this document they state:

"The odor threshold for hydrogen sulfide is variable and various ranges have been reported. Ruth (1986) reviewed odor thresholds of several hundred chemicals, including hydrogen sulfide, from the industrial hygiene literature and other compilations of odor threshold data; an odor threshold range of 0.0005–0.010 ppm was reported. Guidotti (1994) reported an odor threshold range of 0.01–0.3 ppm. Since high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide (150 ppm) can paralyze the olfactory nerve, odor may not be a reliable indicator of the presence of this gas (HSDB 2006)."

Furthermore, the American Industrial Hygiene Association has published a list of critiqued odor detection threshold values for a vast number of substances, including H2S (Table 5.1, pg. 20 of "Odor Thresholds for Chemicals with Established Occupational Health Standards." Copyright 1989 by the AIHA). They list the range of all referenced values to be 0.00007 - 1.4 ppm, with a range of acceptable values based on their critique to be 0.001 - 0.13 ppm. The current value and citation in this entry for the odor recognition threshold of H2S should be replaced with either of the AIHA ranges for H2S odor detection limit thresholds listed above, followed by a comment on the significant variability that has been reported. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jurban48 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hydrogen sulfide as a hybernation inducing agent[edit]

http://www.lewrockwell.com/sardi/sardi78.html VTNC (talk) 15:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Or see here http://www.ted.com/talks/mark_roth_suspended_animation.html I think something about this should be added to the article or? 195.202.134.248 (talk) 18:32, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No matter what, one can't live more than about 130 a. (I already made this a TOB (theorem of biology)) Even including hibernation using H
2S. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suicide[edit]

I cannot understand why it should be described in detail how to commit suicide with it, so I deleted it. I hope you agree.Mycomp 13:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for protecting me from myself. I came here as a supermarket manager looking for the ingredients that others may be purchasing to use, and what to watch out for, but obviously the censorship police have beat me to the punch.

What products are people using to make this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.153.95.1 (talk) 04:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Use calcium polysulphate and muriatic acid. Lime sulphur and HCL toilet bowl cleaner will produce hydrogen sulfide. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.87.225.187 (talk) 19:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Does it Float?[edit]

If you had a container with both liquied and solid forms of this chemical, would the solid form float on the liquid form like the similar H2O solids and liquids do? Jason Harvestdancer | Talk to me 15:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This depends on the densities of liquid and solid hydrogen sulfide. If the solid is denser than the liquid, the solid will sink.
The density of liquid H2S is 914.9 kg m−3, according to Air Liquide. This paper gives the density of solid H2S as around 1.1 g cm−3 (1100 kg m−3). Based on this information, solid hydrogen sulfide will not float on the less dense liquid.
See also this site full of explanations and references.
Ben (talk) 15:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://thefortuno.com/underwater-river-in-mexico/ I thought this was relevant to this discussion. Maybe it should be added to the article? Thafunkiemunkie (talk) 19:21, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Detectors[edit]

Can we add some material on sensor used to detect/measure hydrogen sulfide, such as sewer workers use? RJFJR (talk) 16:40, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal[edit]

I removed the part about suicides as the link was dead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mordekai wiki (talk • contribs) 20:19, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chemistry needs correct formatting[edit]

hi all, FTPLTL. i dont know how to do subscript in wiki so could someone change H2O to H(subscript2)O ect? Thanks Sean2074 (talk) 08:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:12, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So nice to see someone who cares!

Quite easy, actually. Scroll down below the text-editing area, and look for a [selector], just above bold, larger "Please Note:" Click and select "Wiki markup" (likely to be second item on the menu). You'll find a <sub></sub> pair. Put your digit[s] between the tags. Regards, Nikevich (talk) 01:09, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not British English[edit]

"(British English: hydrogen sulphide)" - This is wrong, this is the spelling used in every form of English apart from American English (and presumably Canadian). US English is the odd one out here, not the norm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.123.193.217 (talk) 15:39, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

British english encompasses just about every other form of non-american english. Plasmic Physics (talk) 22:29, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

pKa of HS-[edit]

What is the pKa for HS-? I see it used to be 12.92 then 11.96 and now changed to 12.96. When I searched for supporting references either of the first two were supported, but the numbers are different enough that something is wrong. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:31, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Analytical Chemistry[edit]

Shouldn't this section be more about how to detect H2S using analytical chemistry?

Just a thought. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.180.155.105 (talk) 05:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Occurence[edit]

Hydrogen sulfide is a product of microbial respiration (sulfate reduction) in marine sediments where it can accumulate upon bottom water anoxia (e.g. The Sulfur Cycle of a Coastal Marine Sediment (Limfjorden, Denmark), B.B. Jorgensen, Limnol Oceano, Vol. 22, No. 5, 1977 ). uuuǝıɹ 13:01, 21 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riennn (talk • contribs) [reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hydrogen sulfide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Superconducting under high pressure[edit]

Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system. Sept 2015 calls it sulfer hydride. - Rod57 (talk) 13:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Verified by Troyan et al. up to 140 K Squeezing into superconductivity re Observation of superconductivity in hydrogen sulfide from nuclear resonant scattering - Rod57 (talk) 20:57, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hydrogen sulfide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:38, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hydrogen sulfide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hydrogen sulfide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~93054 articles, patents, reports, etc on H2S as of April, 2018[edit]

@135.84.167.202:@William F. Wood:Thinking that you have a source that must be included in this very general article on H2S? Well get in line, because more than 93,000 other reports exist that could be mentioned according to Chemical Abstracts. But your article is rather recent? Well, 23,179 reports have appeared in the preceding 5 years alone (that is 12 papers/patents/reports per day). These data drive Wikipedia's guidance described in WP:SECONDARY and WP:TERTIARY. --Smokefoot (talk) 20:09, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Supplementing biosynthesis in the body[edit]

Hi everyone!

I'm a chemistry major that has been assigned to edit this wikipedia page for the next few months. I'm looking to add on to the "biosynthesis in the body" section as well as create a new sub heading on hydrogen sulfide's significance in cellular signaling. Recent research has shown that hydrogen sulfide has an extremely wide range of physiological and pathological processes it coordinates such as anti-inflammation, anti-tumor as well as cardiovascular protection. I wanted to introduce a few sources that I plan to supplement the page with over time! Here you go please let me know what you think of these sources:

  1. Rose, Peter; Moore, Philip K.; Zhu, Yi Zhun (14 November 2016). "H2S biosynthesis and catabolism: new insights from molecular studies". Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 74 (8): 1391–1412. doi:10.1007/s00018-016-2406-8.
  2. Wallace, John L.; Wang, Rui (7 April 2015). "Hydrogen sulfide-based therapeutics: exploiting a unique but ubiquitous gasotransmitter". Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 14 (5): 329–345. doi:10.1038/nrd4433.
  3. Wang, Rui (November 2002). "Two's company, three's a crowd: can H2S be the third endogenous gaseous transmitter?". The FASEB Journal. 16 (13): 1792–1798. doi:10.1096/fj.02-0211hyp.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)

--Nkopplin (talk) 01:11, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I came to this talk page to complain about the lack of detail in this article concerning the enzymes/processes that H
2S interacts with. Specifically, the article has no information on which enzymes are responsible for the detoxification of H
2S – hydrogen-sulfide S-acetyltransferase? sulfide:quinone reductase? sulfite oxidase? sulfur dioxygenase? – nor what it is detoxified into – thioacetate? – nor the specific enzyme(s) it affects to cause poisoning (just "mitochondrial cytochrome"). Also, it states that death is caused by CNS stimulation, but does not explain the mechanism by which H
2S causes this stimulation. Nkopplin, if you want to improve the article I suggest starting there; Sulfur metabolism § Oxidation may be of use, although it is poorly referenced. As it stands, this article is a hodgepodge of random bits of information strewn across very poorly categorised sections. 121.217.97.142 (talk) 09:47, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nkopplin. Your sources listed above may be appropriate for a term paper review or journal article, but do not provide proof of concept expected for an encyclopedia. See WP:NOTJOURNAL, #6-8. The hydrogen sulfide literature is highly speculative about its biological role in vivo. Better to briefly discuss (supported by reviews) its synthesis, preliminary biochemistry, etc. The topic is years away from understanding what it may be doing in vivo, a discussion requiring WP:MEDRS reviews on human studies which are not available yet. --Zefr (talk) 16:44, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Primary research, no results[edit]

This revert was justified because there is no concluded research to report in the article. We can report research when there is actual information to inform users that hydrogen sulfide has an effect which is reviewed and published in a medical journal per WP:MEDRS. Zefr (talk) 17:34, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hydrogen_sulfide&oldid=1194481316"