Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baptist Redemption

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge into Long Island Iced Tea, which seems to be the closing result per the 12-year old discussion referenced below and the edit history of the nominated page. Steel1943 (talk) 17:13, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Baptist Redemption[edit]

Unverifiable substub. Drink does not appear on Google (outside Wikipedia and mirrors), bartending reference sites, or in The Complete Bartender. Delete unless verified. -- Cyrius|✎ 05:13, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Delete. Even if it were real, it would just be an entry in Long Island iced tea. Dbenbenn 06:25, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Merge and redirect with Long Island iced tea to avoid recreation. Mgm|^(talk) 09:13, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
- You want to merge something that appears to be made up? -- Cyrius|✎ 04:32, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete if unverified, merge and redirect if verified. Average Earthman 13:25, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Redirect only. This way, we don't even have to mess with the verification. Geogre 13:30, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Aw, go ahead and Merge it. Wyss 01:00, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- It's unverifiable, why do you want to keep it around? -- Cyrius|✎ 04:32, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  - I've heard of it. Wyss 19:40, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Merge. It's true, but warrants not it's own page.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.