Talk:Fad diet

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Fad diet.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fad diet article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1: 60 days

Food and drink High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Skepticism High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A dumping ground is available: Talk:Fad_diet/Dumping_ground

Thanks[edit]

I hadn't looked at this article for about a year, and I think it's improved significantly. I particularly appreciate Signimu's effort made to approach it as a phenomenon that has happened over the course of history, instead of a list of every thing that's ever been called a fad diet. Thank you for your work on this article. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:40, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of misleading material[edit]

"Although fad diets may have a negative connotation for health professionals, some have scientific evidences and therapeutic applications, such as the ketogenic diet for epilepsy or caloric restriction and the Mediterranean diet for obesity and diabetes, and several producing similar benefits to commercial diets or standard care when done under professional supervision."

The above content I removed from the lead. It is entirely inaccurate and not supported properly by the referencing. The ketogenic diet to treat epilepsy has never been considered a fad diet, and that is not supported by the sourcing. Also the Mediterranean diet has never been listed in mainstream nutritional textbooks or by health agencies as a fad diet. Not recently or historically. The last line "several producing similar benefits to commercial diets or standard care when done under professional supervision" is not an accurate or clear statement. Commercial diets are not fad diets. Psychologist Guy (talk) 17:13, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source being used for the "Commercial diets" was this paper [1]. The paper does not mention the word "fad diet" at all, secondly the diets mentioned are all mainstream diets commonly accepted for different reasons, low-calorie, vegetarian, vegan, Mediterranean etc. These are not fad diets. Psychologist Guy (talk) 17:17, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My first thought was to revert the deletion, but as the article is about "fad diets", then my second thought is that content about non-fad diets should be removed. David notMD (talk) 20:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Link to reference #64 seems broken...[edit]

..., and doing a quick search I only found this (as similar or related):

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-42264838

Not sure what to do, hopefully someone can give a hint. :)

Kind regards riveravaldez (talk) 20:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed this as the link has been archived [2] Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]