Talk:Cate Tiernan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Copied from an anonymous (195.93.48.9) contribution to the personal page of the apparently non-existent Wikipedia user User:Bloodwitch:

Hi, i think Cate Tienan is that best. Her books have inspired me so much and in a way helped me.A first, i thought reading was boring, but i was looking in a book store once, when i came across book of shadows. The front cover looked interesting, so i picked it up and read that back. I decided to but the book. When i got home i couldn't put the book down, i finished it in two days. At the time i didn't know that book of shadows was the first of a siers of book, but when i did find out i was ovewr the moon!
The thing i like about Cate tiernan is the way she ends her books. She leaves you hanging there wanting to read more. If you have read her books you will know what i am talking about. Another thing i like about her books, is that her books are not just aboutwitchcraft, but they are also about a normal tennage love life and life at home. At the end of each of her books they always leave me wondering what it would be like to be a blood witch.
I heard that Full Circle would be that last book annd that made me very upset, also living in engaland i have to wait longer for the books to comeout. Next year i plan to go to america and get the hole of the series of books as i am not very good at waiting for things(according to my mum!) cate tiernan e considerada a melhor altora de livros bom em minha opiniao


I never thought reading could be so fun. Once when i had finished reading i thought i had just finished watching a flim. I think Cate Tiernan should make her siries of book into a flim and that might get more people to read the books.
I don't think there is any one quite like Cate Tiernan. Keep up the good work!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That's not NPOV, of course, so don't include it verbatim in the article... --FvdP 23:29, 4 Aug 2003 (UTC)

this is a cool book

Image of Cate Tiernan[edit]

If possible, can a better picture of Tiernan be put up since the current one is very unclear.--Spaztic ming 17:02, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Change Article Title?[edit]

The title of this article is a pseudonym -- I have found the woman's real name, and have rewritten the article on that basis. At this point, I would think the article should be retitled with her real name, and the pseudonym redirected to it -- but as a relative Wikipedia neophyte, I'm not sure how to do that without screwing it up. So I've just added the new information I found, and I leave it to a more experienced editor to retitle the article and do a redirect for "Cate Tiernan" -- if that is indeed what should be done.DoctorJoeE (talk) 06:13, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't think so. She's most well known as Cate Tiernan, and it's sort of an unwritten rule that that's how people with pseudonyms should be listed. 66.30.63.155 (talk) 02:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds reasonable - that's why I didn't change it: I couldn't find any guidelines in either direction. (And because I didn't know how...)DoctorJoeE (talk) 04:09, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So should the two links to Gabrielle Charbonnet be redirected or changed? BTW, an article from 2008 says that the four Maximum Ride books which had been published then have "an uncredited co-writer, Gabrielle Charbonnet". Thanks in advance! --Kletta (talk) 06:34, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possible COI[edit]

To user Gcharbonnet: Welcome to Wikipedia.

I noticed your edits to this article, and given your user name, I thought it at least possible that you might be Gabrielle Charbonnet. If I am wrong, please disregard this message and accept my apology for the intrusion. If I am correct, please read on.

Wikipedia Conflict of Interest guidelines, WP:COI for short, address the issues surrounding individuals/organizations editing articles about themselves. Please read that entire policy. Anyone associated with either Cate Tiernan or her books must abide by WP:COI in this article. Simply put, this means that you cannot make changes yourself; you need to request them on this Talk Page for review and (likely) incorporation.

Per the guidelines, please post a formal Declaration of Interest here, if you plan to contribute further.

Also, please take the time to read WP:Welcome to Wikipedia and WP:Five pillars, and help improve this article with reliable third-party verifiable sources. Thanks! DoctorJoeE (talk) 05:03, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cate Tiernan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:07, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cate Tiernan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:28, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cate_Tiernan&oldid=1200481499"