Talk:Italic type

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Names of ships[edit]

The names of ships?! Surely this shouldn't be third on the list, if it's there at all.

--jc

Meaning?[edit]

"Words used as words."

What does that even mean?

--Frostyservant 04:00, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I've tried to clarify what I believe the original meaning was. (Felix the Cassowary)

This article seems rather ... short and incomplete compared to the information easily obtainable. If I had the time, I'd do a bit of research and expand it now. But I don't. I've added a brief history but I hope this article can become one of the best articles on Wikipedia (at least compared to its current state) because there's so much more to italics then what's written already... I've added a stub comment for now in the hopes that maybe someone else will help. Felix the Cassowary 13:25, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

POV[edit]

"The first italic type was employed by Aldus Manutius on his famous edition of Virgil, published at Venice in 1501, and is said to have been cut by Francesco de Bologna to imitate the beautiful hand-writing of Petrarch, famous Italian poet. The form at first consisted only of lower-case, important words being started with small roman capitals and it was independent of any roman font. The italic was used for the complete text, and in the hands of Aldus and the Elzevirs it made an admittedly graceful page medium, but somewhat too informal, in our estimation, and less legible than the more dignified roman style. The use of italic for emphasis in roman text was a later development which some say has marked the loss of its individual character, and not until Garamond made matched romans and italics was associated use considered."

Highlighted some pov statements, and also weasel-words in the last sentence. [unsigned comment by anonymous user at 69.119.123.118

The entire above paragraph is a direct quote from Type Lore by J.L. Frazier in 1925. --137.112.144.199 00:38, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about italic handwriting?[edit]

Anyone out there able to provide descriptive info regarding the new italic handwriting as a substitute for cursive or block print?

Fyi...


http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/family/article/0,2792,DRMN_107_4536159,00.html

It's estimated that 7 percent of children are being taught italic, which is popular with home-schoolers. The Beaverton, Ore., school district has adopted italic as its writing curriculum, and it's an option in the Portland district. In Denver Public Schools, there's no districtwide handwriting program, spokesman Mark Stevens says.

I believe that a few years ago the Portland, Ore., school board had to settle a debate between teachers in the district who wanted to teach their children to write D'Nealian and those who preferred italic. The school board decided to let each teacher do whatever he or she wanted.

D'Nealian was abandoned in my son's school district in California after he finished Kindergarten, but I don't think they replaced it with italic. 4.243.146.81 17:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oblique/Italic[edit]

This article begins by making a distinction between proper italic and labels simply slanted fonts oblique...then the rest of the article discusses oblique. I suggest that this should be moved to Oblique_type so this article can focus on the history of the typeface. bodhidharma 14:52, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Italic/Oblique and non western letters[edit]

Could someone please diversify the history? How did it come that latin script oblique letters look one way (today?), but others, e.g. cyrillic letters, do not. Also do these scripts make the same distinction between italics and oblique? Are there any in depth sources on this topic?--Hhielscher 15:29, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a passing reference to left-leaning Arabic. I think much more detail is required. Are italics used in the same way in Arabic? Are there changes in form apart from leaning left? Tesspub (talk) 16:59, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese and Japanese[edit]

The following sentence exists inside the article Punctuation: "Italic type is never used in Chinese or Japanese.". My question: Why is italic type never used in Chinese or Japanese? --88.77.242.131 18:58, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Basically because it's a European invention. As far as I know, it's used only in the Latin and Cyrillic alphabets, and no other writing systems. (I'm not sure about Greek, but I don't think it is.) —Angr 00:22, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There are italic type for Greeks too, and not just the capitals. In Times New Roman, italic lower case gamma has the ball-shaped terminator that is not found in Roman font. As for lacking italic CJK letters, there are practical reasons of the lacking italic type. Chinese and Japanese languages have been adapted to be written vertically and horizontally, so if you try to apply italic or oblique effect, how should you tilt the letters? GUIs and word processors may have their ways of doing it, but those methods cause the same letter to look differently depending on whether the text flow is horizontal or vertical. If you think that's bad, at least it doesn't involve right to left text flow. --Jacob Poon 01:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob Poon (talk • contribs)
In many (but not all) ways the distinction between katakana and hiragana mirrors the distinction between italic and Roman. I think this is at least worth mentioning Tesspub (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marking Titles[edit]

Where the italics do not indicate emphasis, but are marking a title or something that is being mentioned or defined, quotation marks may be substituted:

  • The word "the" is an article.
  • An "even" number is one that is a multiple of 2.

There is a problem with the second example. If one was going to emphasize "even", then one should italicize it only. There shouldn't even be quotation marks anywhere in that statement as it stands. When defining a word, one shouldn't surround the word with quotation marks. I believe the example to be poor, and the rule defined as poor also.

For example:

A marker is a felt-tip writing or coloring utensil using ink. The word "marker" refers to a felt-tip writing or coloring utensil using ink.

I will change it for now. If someone disputes it, change it back. LtDonny 23:47, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ode to Joy is a bad example[edit]

I think the use of "Ode to Joy" is a poor example for the article. In the examples it seems clear by context that the poem itself isn't being referenced, but Beethoven's composition is. The problem is that Beethoven's "Ode to Joy" isn't a stand-alone composition, but is the choral finale to his 9th symphony. Based upon our statement in the article, "Works that appear within larger works ... are not italicized, but merely set off in quotation marks," it should be set off by quotation marks, not italics. Gentgeen (talk) 04:10, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very valid point, & I'll change this example to something less ambiguous. Actually, the whole Usage section may belong someplace else, since it's not so much about italic forms as the distinction between roman and italic (or oblique), and usage probably varies from style book to style book. But I won't get into that right now. Herbivore (talk) 03:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

mistakes[edit]

saying 'This style is called "italic" simply because the style originated in Italy.' sounds too cheap - more information is needed there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitrofurano (talk • contribs) 18:28, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Korean[edit]

Is italic type ever used in Korean? --88.78.2.206 (talk) 20:47, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Italic of GREEK origin[edit]

According to several ancient texts, Greeks wrote in cursive i nthe 6th century before Christ. There is no reference whatsoever to this in the article and it is wrongly attributed to Italy as origin. 195.10.10.180 (talk) 16:47, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-English Usage Rules[edit]

All the rules cited are drawn from English usage, although this is not stated explicitly. What about non-English users of the Latin alphabet? (French, Portuguese, German, etc) Tesspub (talk) 12:30, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lines above letters[edit]

Why are there lines above certain letters when using italics?AmericanLeMans (talk) 16:19, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Parentheses[edit]

The article says that the Chicago Manual of Style recommends parentheses around italicized text should also be italicized, but I believe Chicago 15 and 16 recommend otherwise. Someone with access to a few different editions of Chicago may want to confirm and edit as appropriate. John P. McCaskey (talk) 17:15, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why no fi ligature in the examples?[edit]

—Wegesrand (talk) 17:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Might get round to this some time. Blythwood (talk) 22:43, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

A print of the letters of Catherine of Siena in the year 1500 seems to be considered by most sources to be the earliest use of italic font, not the 1501 text currently listed in this article. I would suggest emending it. The frontispiece in which it appears is perhaps interesting too and worth including in the article as a historical moment of experimentation in typeface. See for instance, https://exhibitions.cul.columbia.edu/exhibits/show/type_to_print/roman/catherine , http://exhibits.lib.byu.edu/aldine/4Siena.html . Altenmaeren (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Altenmaeren[reply]

There are italic letters on that page. However, they're not printed as letters but rather as part of a printed illustration. Or is that beside the point? Richard 16:17, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent point. The "s" on the left and on the right look a bit different, but otherwise it looks consistent enough to say that this is the (albeit minor) use of a newly-cast font (a test run?), rather than a carving or engraving of italic letters on a woodcut or engraving. But I'm not a typography expert, really, more a manuscript guy! Altenmaeren (talk) 12:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Since that print was made by Manutius as well, 'test run' might be a perfect way of putting it. Richard 12:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Italic type. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:02, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Italic type. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:55, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Italic type. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:05, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Addition/edition[edit]

I don't know how to edit notes, but note a has "additions" in place of "editions". --87.115.226.248 (talk) 21:41, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, fixed! Notes are written in the page source at the point of the text they comment on. Blythwood (talk) 03:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Italic_type&oldid=1203026970"