Talk:Fort Bridgewoods

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fort Bridgewoods article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Fortifications / Technology / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kent Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Untitled[edit]

The owner of www.forts.org.uk has copied this text into Wikipedia. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fort_Charlotte

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008[edit]

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling[edit]

Should this article be "Bridgewood" or "Bridgewoods" ? I ask because both forms of spelling are used in the article. Consistent it is not. RASAM (talk) 16:39, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bridgewoods. The external link pdf calls it that, and has a photo with that name. Local history booklets and Saunders Fortress Britain use the plural Vicarage (talk) 22:18, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then it might be a good idea to move this article to Fort Bridgewoods, and for consistency, edit the text accordingly. At the moment it is a rather pointless redirect. What do you think Vicarage ? (By the way, I'll do the text, if you do the moving; or tell me how to do it). RASAM (talk) 20:19, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, but I fear moving the article would upset the wikipedian gods, as I don't know the protocol. Can I leave the whole thing to you. Vicarage (talk) 05:52, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I said above, I'll do the text, but I don't know how to move the page; if you are in the same boat, we're both snookered and that's a shame. RASAM (talk) 23:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]