Talk:Lithia (The Outer Limits)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I removed the criticism section. It's not that I don't agree with it -- I do agree and I find the episode rather annoying because of it. It may be ok to reference it this way: "The episode has been criticised for..." -- if you can find a source for that criticism other than: "This is a what I think". See NPOV. Motor 10:48, 2005 Mar 18 (UTC)

Why am I not surprised? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.158.1.165 (talk) 19:54, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no copyvio on this page -- I wrote most of it myself. The opening and closing narrations are small quotes from the show. - Motor (talk) 19:46, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lithia (The Outer Limits). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:53, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lithia (The Outer Limits). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Technology ?[edit]

There seems to be a mismatch in technology levels, in that they don't even have electricity, yet somehow cryogenic chambers and artificial insemination with frozen sperm exists. Is this explained somehow ? Perhaps some "enclaves" could be anti-technology and others be OK with it ? SinisterLefty (talk) 16:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ultra-feminist ?[edit]

This episode presents all men as evil warmongers, and all women as pacifists. Is the writer an ultra-feminist ? That would seem odd considering the writer is male (Sam Egan). SinisterLefty (talk) 16:28, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]