Talk:Ontario Highway 410

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleOntario Highway 410 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starOntario Highway 410 is part of the 400-series highways series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 24, 2011Good article nomineeListed
September 21, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Untitled[edit]

Is there a source for the proposed exits listed (north of Sandlewood of course)? Or are these interchanges just based on speculation? If there is a proper source, it should be posted at the botton of the page. Thanks --149.99.202.182 20:37, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Up to Hurontario - based on the official plans. After that, an old Orangeville plan indicated those exits, along with an interchange at Peel Road 24 (old Highway 24) (also can be seen on the Highway 10 page on www.onthighways.com) and the rest are speculation, but they are the major intersections. Also, There were old drawings planned by the previous Conservative government to extend to at least Highway 89, but that was never funded (source: Linda Jeffrey, MPP Brampton Centre).

Orphaned references in Ontario Highway 410[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Ontario Highway 410's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "2010 mapart":

  • From Ontario Highway 405: Ontario Back Road Atlas (Map). Cartography by MapArt. Peter Heiler. 2010. p. 19. § R34–35. ISBN 978-1-55198-226-7.
  • From Ontario Highway 2A: MapArt 2010
  • From Don Valley Parkway: Ontario Back Road Atlas (Map). Cartography by MapArt. Peter Heiler Ltd. 2010. ISBN 978-1-55198-226-7.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 17:34, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

Extension
Up to Bovaird

-- ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 03:15, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline
  • July 1969 - Earliest mention by mayor William Brydon[1]
  • February 1970 - Brampton Mayor Jim Archdekin met with highway minister George Gomme and Chinguacousy Reeve Robert Williams[2]
  • August 1970 - Report from ministry[3]
  • May 1975 - Construction began on widening of 401 to eight lanes between Hwy 427 and Hwy 10, includes the interchange with future 410.[4]
  • Spring 1983 - Contracts awarded to grade two lanes from Orenda to south of Queen Street, including partial interchange at Clark, Brampton constructs West Drive to serve as a detour
  • Spring 1984 - Grading completed. Contracts awarded for both structures over CN railway and the paving of northbound lanes from north of Glidden to Vodden, including partial interchange at Queen (Hwy 7)
  • Spring 1985 - Railway bridges complete and Clark interchange complete. Northbound lanes and Hwy 7 IC under construction, to be done by fall. Two contracts awarded: to construct 7N east from Hwy 10 and Boivard interchange, and to pave northbound lanes from Steeles to Glidden, including both bridges over Glidden. Expected to be completed by summer of 1986.
  • Spring 1986 - NB Complete from south of CNR to south of Vodden. Contract awarded to pave NB from Vodden to Boivard IC, including IC at Williams Parkway
  • Spring 1987 - 2 lanes opened to traffic from Steeles to Vodden, plans underway for full freeway concept. Contract to construct six lanes from 401 to Steeles awarded, including IC at Derry
  • Spring 1988 - 2 lanes opened from Steeles to Boivard. Contract for 401 ramps awarded. Structures over Etobicoke Creek complete. Contracts awarded to build SB lanes from Boivard to Steeles and widen south of Steeles to six lanes
  • Fall 1990 - Ramps to 401 complete
  • Spring 1991 - Contracts to connect 403 to 410 awarded; Highway 410 completed

-- ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 04:19, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

refs
  1. ^ "Brampton Groups Ask for Pedestrian Mall". The Toronto Star. July 2, 1969. p. 41. {{cite news}}: |section= ignored (help)
  2. ^ "Brampton Plans Discussion with McKeough". The Toronto Star. January 15, 1970. p. 63. {{cite news}}: |section= ignored (help)
  3. ^ "Bypass Report Due in Brampton". The Toronto Star. August 28, 1970. p. 31. {{cite news}}: |section= ignored (help)
  4. ^ Claridge, Thomas (May 3, 1975). "Years of Headaches Driver' Prospect as 401 is Widened". The Globe and Mail. Vol. 132, no. 39, 125. Toronto. p. 1.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ontario Highway 410/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grondemar (talk · contribs) 16:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article in general looks good; I have a few concerns that need to be addressed before the review can be passed:

  • It's a little confusing that the Route description runs south-to-north, while the Exit list runs north-to-south. Is there a way to get the two sections running in the same direction?
  • "From this point north to Bovaird Drive, the two highways were concurrent." Aren't they still concurrent?
  • "Ernie Eves" who is that? The name is thrown into the beginning of a paragraph with no explanation on who is this and why they are important.
  • It would be nice if the bare URLs in the citations could be cleaned up, either using citation templates or by hand.
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    This GAN is placed on hold for a minimum of seven days to allow the above concerns to be addressed.

Thanks. Grondemar 16:31, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review! Regarding your first point, both flow from south to north (Highway 401 is at the southern end, and at the northern end is Highway 10) I've reworded the sentence for the second point, but essentially Highway 7 was made concurrent with the highway in the 1980s, but then decommissioned through Brampton in 1997 (although, for some reason the signs are still there on the freeway for both 7 and 410). The last point I still have to address; will respond again when I've dealt with it. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 18:47, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You are absolutely right on the first point; don't know what I was thinking when I wrote that. Thanks for the prose improvements; I made one further copyedit. Let me know when the sources are cleaned up and I'll pass the review. Grondemar 19:07, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, sources are all filled out. Cheers, ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 03:33, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the cleanup, and sorry for taking a while getting back to this. I have now passed this good article nomination. Congratulations! Grondemar 02:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GTA West Corridor & Effects on Highway 410[edit]

In September 2019, the GTA West Corridor EA put out this PDF of preferred interchange locations, including an extension of Highway 410. Should I mention this now or should I wait until the EA is approved by the province before adding this as a new Future section? Username6892 13:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]